New York Times: Europe was not in the process of Iran -US negotiations

In the first three mohs of US Preside Donald Trump’s second governme, many eves, including Trump’s economic war against the world, Washington’s widening with Moscow, began indirect talks between Iran and the United States without Europe’s presence and a decline in US security commitmes to Europe.

But one of the most importa developmes is the decline in the importance of Europe and the green coine for the United States, as the American Magazine of the New York Times wrote: “In the first three mohs of Trump’s presence at the White House, communicating with him has become one of the European goals, and only a few people such as Georgia, Georgia Meloni.”

“One of the most confusing factors in the curre situation is that many of the US and European ierfaces are not classic diplomats, but messengers, ambassadors, and special consultas such as Ilan Musk and Steve Witakaf, and it is unclear,” the New York Times quoted European officials as saying.

“The Trump administration officials do not value US allies, and they are all seeking to fulfill Trump’s orders and demands,” European officials said. “For example, US officials did not inform any European coury about Washington’s decision to start talks with Tehran.”

“This is while the three European couries signatories (Britain, France and Germany) have been iermediaries of its agreeme and are trying to make progress in the negotiations to reach a new agreeme,” the New York Times added.

Europe is an enemy of America

“Europe is one of the key allies of the US, but the economic or other European capabilities have not made the coine one of Trump’s priorities,” the American magazine wrote. Rather, in the eyes of Trump, Europe is a competitor or even the enemy of America. “The purpose of establishing the European Union was to hurt America.”

“The Trump administration is not ierested in hearing Europeans,” the New York Times quoted European diplomats as saying. “They are not looking for advice and everything is about unilateralism.”

Referring to “the iimate meeting of US officials with their European officials” and the visit of Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witekaf and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to France to consult with Iran and talks with Iran, “But it is never clear which of the US foreign policy.”

“On the other hand, it is difficult to communicate with US officials,” the New York Times added. Allied officials can sometimes talk to Mike Waltz, the White House National Security Adviser, Witcaf or Keith Clov. “But it is difficult to communicate with these people.”

The American magazine also wrote: “It is much more difficult to communicate with US officials through official channels as the US Senate has confirmed limited senior officials and this has aroused the outrage of US allies because lower -level officials who do not need Senate’s approval are much more”.

NATO members are a number of people

“According to Trump, US allies in NATO are a few,” the New York Times said, referring to Trump’s pessimism to the European Union and NATO. “His mistrust of the iernational institutions and multilateralism remains, and he believes that these institutions are barred from American power.”

“Trump administration officials see his view as their own policy,” the American magazine added. Rubio refused to meet with EU foreign policy in Washington. Other European officials have failed to meet Trump and others do not care about US officials. “This has led Europe to take an attempt to communicate with the White House on the power of national leaders of European couries, including the Italian prime minister.”

Meloni was the only senior EU senior official to be invited to Trump’s inauguration, and after “weeks of effort”, he will meet Trump on Thursday evening.

“Many Trump administration officials, including Peter Navaro, Trump’s economic adviser, have refused to meet with their European couerparts,” the New York Times quoted European officials as saying.

Europe must Learn to take care of itself

“In many issues, including economic and commercial issues, Trump is the only decision maker,” the American magazine wrote. “According to US Minister of Commerce Howard Lututin, he is just a letter and has no role in Washington’s decisions.”

“Under such circumstances, many European officials believe that any support for Ukraine should also include the United States,” the New York Times added. But many senior European statesmen, including Macron (French Preside) and Starmer (Prime Minister), have failed to reach a good deal with Trump despite their efforts. “

“But at the work and executive level, Europe’s satisfaction with the United States is very low,” the American magazine also wrote. Some are unhappy with Trump’s coact with Putin and his bullying behavior against Ukrainian Preside Walodimir Zelksky. According to US officials, the Americans do not wa Europeans to ierfere in relations with Moscow and have resisted European demands for Ukraine negotiations and US ierference in any security guaraee after resolution. “

“In the Trump world, Europe is an example of the old consensus displayed by the former US preside, and now the coalition has to learn to take care of itself while Washington redefines the world,” the New York Times wrote.

The end of the message