London plan to deploy English soldiers in Ukraine 4 years

According to RCO News Agency, the Telegraph newspaper reported that Britain is planning to deploy soldiers in Ukraine for five years under plans by Westerners to send troops to Ukraine.

According to the British newspaper, several military officials from the “Coalition of Election Coalition”, a coalition in accordance with Western soldiers to Ukraine, have called for militas se to Ukraine to participate in training and rebuilding the Ukrainian army.

Also, while discussing the coalition under the leadership of France and Britain over “maiaining a post -war peace agreeme”, a plan for the step -out departure of troops from Ukraine has also been discussed.

According to the telegraph, one of the options on the table was that a European force was se to Ukraine on the pretext that “Russia is primarily preveing any agreeme and providing the Ukrainian forces that they need a lot of need.”

According to the Telegraph, French military planners have argued that “this Vladimir Putin will be able to attack another attack while Western forces within Ukraine, while his soldiers were only able to seize small parts of Ukraine.”

The report said that the Ukrainian expeditionary forces, led by France and Britain, will also coribute to the protection of Ukraine’s airspace and water, but “the main purpose of these forces is to immediately help the Ukrainian Armed Forces training and rebuilding aimed at preveing another Russian attack. “They will later make a multi -step exit process so that the last soldiers will leave there at the end of a five -year period.”

According to the British newspaper, the five -year plan “Britain, France and their other Western allies will accelerate to rebuild and strengthen the Ukrainian army before Moscow is ready to launch a full -fledged war. “British ielligence chiefs, Denmark and Germany believe Putin will be ready again in a short period of five years.”

Earlier, British Defense Secretary John Haley said that the coalition’s plans did not reveal the details of the coalition after the meeting was “making Putin wisely”.

But he told reporters: “I confirm that we have discussed four goals or missions while military planning: securing the skies, securing the seas, supporting peace in the land, and supporting the rebuilding and strengthening of Ukrainian forces. “The Ukrainians themselves say that the best security for us in the future is the power of our own forces and the ability to preve Russia ourselves in the future.”

According to the Telegraph, the ministers of the ehusiastic coalition were in the process of rece talks between the Admiral of Tony Radakin, the head of the British Armed Forces and General Tier Barcard, his French couerpart and their Ukrainian couerparts, and then hoped to provide forces. But the response to the plans set by Tony Radakin Admiral has disappoied some officials, and there has been concern that the coalition programs are vague and slow. “

According to the magazine, the defense ministers attending Thursday’s Summit, which were symbolically held at the NATO headquarters without the presence of Americans, are still unaware of the format and format of any poteially deployed in Ukraine.

“In relation to any reliable force for Ukraine, we also need to know what is really about what is really about,” said EU foreign policy official. Is it about deterrence? Is it about observation? Is it about peace? What is our purpose? ”

“Discussions over the coalition of poteial ehusiasm in rece weeks have failed to achieve the ceasefire, as the peace talks led by Donald Trump in the ceasefire have failed,” the Telegraph wrote. This situation has suspended political decisions on the options made by a team of almost four military planners. Other coalition couries have expressed concern over sending troops to Ukraine without US support by British Prime Minister Kerry Starmer. Uil now, Donald Trump has not se any signals to allow the US to directly participate in the formation of reassuring forces for Ukraine. »

The end of the message