Zionist Foreign Minister: I’m not optimistic about the US -Iran agreement

According to RCO News Agency, Zionist Foreign Minister Gadaon Sahar during a detailed ierview with the Figaro newspaper in response to how a new agreeme on Iran’s nuclear program can be successful, while Iran’s nuclear program has been almost differe, repeating Iran’s allegations. At the White House, we have a more decisive preside. Iran also has a new governme. And Europeans have opened their eyes; Both because of the Ukrainian war that revealed Tehran’s aid to Russia and because of Iran’s direct attacks on us in April and October, which shows what its proxy forces such as Hamas and Hezbollah have, especially from October 7 (Operation “Hurricane Al -Aqsa” against Hamas.

The claim of financial and weapons support of the regional resistance groups and their actions are raised by the Zionist regime and allies when Iranian officials, while supporting the liberation aspirations of these groups, have rejected the claim that resistance groups are independe and at their discretion.

Iranian and Russian officials have repeatedly denied Tehran’s military aid to Moscow for use in the Ukrainian war. Tehran has emphasized that, unlike Kiev’s Western partners and allies, who are openly involved in military ierveion in the war, they do not support any of the parties and are ready to assist in the only political solution to resolve the war.

The possibility of a new agreeme on Iran’s nuclear program

Sahar, whose regime in the Iernational Court of Justice has been accused of genocide in Gaza and has invaded Lebanese and Syrian territory, said in an ierview with the newspaper: “We no longer need to explain the nature of Iran’s aggression!” Today all have one question; What if they did it without a nuclear weapon, what would they do with a nuclear umbrella? For these reasons, I expect the iernational community to be more determined. Of course, this does not mean my optimism about the possibility of reaching an agreeme, as the gap between the US and Iran’s view is still very widespread.

The Zionist regime, like the main ally of the United States, claims military targets in Iran’s nuclear program. Meanwhile, Iranian officials have emphasized the powerful defense of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program while saying that the production and use of nuclear weapons according to the fatwa of the Supreme Leader of Iran has no place in Iran’s defense doctrine.

On the other hand, Iran’s nuclear program is under the most severe IAEA verification and supervision program, and so far, the iernational institution has not proved and confirmed such a claim in its numerous reports on Iran’s nuclear activity.

Following the ierview, the Zionist Foreign Minister said: “I will not speculate on this if diplomacy fails, whether the United States will join Tel Aviv’s military operation against Iran’s nuclear facilities.” But I repeat our goal, Iran should not become a nuclear power. We are now at a time of history that because of the global consensus, there is a real opportunity to achieve this goal. How? Time will show. But our will is in common with America and France.

The answer to the question came after US Preside Donald Trump said in an ierview with NBC News last Sunday in a threatening stateme about agreeme with Iran: “If we do not reach an agreeme with Iran and would not receive a guaraee for not producing nuclear weapons by Iran.”

Trump, who is known for his threatening statemes for the highest pois, said: “Iranian and American officials are negotiating.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Sayed Abbas Arakchi said in a message on X -Social Network: “It should be clear to everyone that there is nothing called” military option “at all, let alone” military solution “. The catastrophic failures in our region, which cost more than $ 5 trillion for previous US governmes, are sufficie.

Gaza war

In another part of the conversation, the Zionist Foreign Minister responded to the question of what the regime’s strategy was in Gaza and why, despite diplomatic efforts to coinue the ceasefire, the war resumes: We have two goals that are the liberation of captives and eradicate any future threat to Israel and its citizens. If Hamas forces leave Gaza and deliver their weapons, the war will end tomorrow. But so far, they have proven that they do not wa peace.

Sahar justified claims against the Zionist regime’s occupation policies against the Hamas moveme and said: “Rest assured the Israelis will not abandon their captives and we will never return to the situation before October 7th; That is, Gaza’s permane military threat. Hamas uses the winning leaf of captives to force Israel to surrender and impose its situation, which is unacceptable, the price we have paid so far. According to our information, their goal is still an attack on Israel and we cannot risk it.

Trump’s plan for Palestinian forced migration under the pretext of rebuilding Gaza

In response to whether Donald Trump’s plan has been abandoned for Gaza, Sahar said: No, this is conditional on two conditions; First of all, the Gazes who wa to migrate to be allowed to migrate because this is by no means a mandatory displaceme, and the second is to find couries that accept volueers.

Trump’s plan to rebuild Gaza and turn it io a tourist coastal area has been considered ethnic cleansing.
The couries of the region have also announced their opposition to such a plan.

He we on to defend the Palestinian ethnic cleansing plan: I do not understand why the Syrians and Afghans have the right to immigrate, but the Palestinians are not! Or better say, I understand; The Palestinians are political tools against Israel and some wa to keep them in the camps!

Normalization of Zionist relations with Saudi Arabia

Figaro we on to explain: “We hope for this normalization, but it is more difficult to achieve in war conditions,” Figaro we on to say: Undoubtedly, it will be possible under the Trump administration, but a little later.

Saudi Arabia, after the Gaza war, has ended the occupation of the region and accepts the formation of an independe Palestinian state through the “state -state” solution in a way that is prerequisite for any normalization of relations with the Zionist regime.

Annexation

Responding to whether the Zionist regime will incorporate the West Bank io the occupied territories, Sahar said: “In our view, these lands are disputed, not occupied.” We have been ready to negotiate many times, but it is not possible with the curre PA. We do not wa to rule over them, but today it is impossible to form an independe Palestinian state in “Judaism and the Occupied West Bank), as they will be under Hamas corol and threaten Israel’s security.

“Ahmad al -Sharia is better for Israel than Bashar al -Assad”

The Zionist Foreign Minister, in response to whether Ahmad al -Sharia, the head of the Tahrir al -Sham group, now heading the Syrian governing body, was better for the Zionist regime than former Syrian Preside Bashar al -Assad or worse than that, and he was not able to do so. So, we welcomed his fall.

“We must be realistic about the new regime of Damascus,” he said. The regime has not been democratic and there are about 5,000 Islamist extremist forces in Syria, many of which have been released by the new governme, and we know they are seeking to fight the Golan Heights. All our actions in Syria are to strengthen our security and preve the opening of a new fro against Israel.

The Zionist regime targeted the air bases of Hama and Homs provinces in Syria on Wednesday and Thursday.

The regime had also bombed various military and strategic pois of Syria at the beginning of the Tahrir al -Sham group dominating Syria, and in some areas it was seeking to establish a retaining area.

Türkiye’s role in Syria

“The Turks have strong influence in Syria and openly wa to create a corolled area,” the French media wrote. We are concerned about their military presence and their attacks on the Kurds in northern Syria.

In response to rece Zionist attacks on Syria, the Turkish Foreign Ministry said in a stateme that Israel has become the biggest security threat to our region by attacks on the territorial iegrity and national unity of the region. Israel, as a strategic strategic factor in the region, simultaneously creates chaos and fostering terrorism.

The ministry added that the Zionist regime must first “abandon its developme policy, leave the occupied territories” and “weaken efforts to consolidate the Syrian situation.”

Türkiye, after the fall of Assad, insisted that it would coinue its efforts to preve the activity of Syrian Democratic Forces, which consider them a terrorist organization. Ankara has maiained its troops in northern Syria and has so far had several military clashes with Syrian democratic forces.

Europe’s criticism of the Zionist regime’s actions

Responding to whether you feel that Europeans do not understand you, Sahar addressed the regime’s defending the terrorist and transgressive acts of the regime, including the assassination of resistance leaders in rece years and attacks on the territory of independe couries, and said: “There is a big gap between our achievemes and the treatme of European governmes.” Everyone is happy for the defeat of Hezbollah and Hamas, the death of Nasrallah and the fall of Assad, but criticize our methods that made these results. Everyone says, “Well to destroy Hamas!” But how do you think we did this? With a stateme?!

The Zionist Foreign Minister claimed that Israel is a democratic society. Unlike Türkiye, our governme does not attack the opposition! However, no criticism of Erdogan’s extremism is seen as a NATO ally.

Tel Aviv-Paris Relationships

At the end of the ierview, Sahar said in response to what Israel -France relations that have had ups and downs after October 7, said: Despite the disagreemes, the dialogue is very importa. We wa positions based on field realities. But the propaganda of governme solution is unrealistic in the curre situation, because if a Palestinian governme is formed tomorrow, it will mean Hamas corol. We all have dreams and hopes, but we must be realistic about the issues that affect the security of the region. The failure of the extremist fro is a better condition for a better future and we must focus on it.
The end of the message