Economist: Zelnsky will shock Putin and Trump in the elections

Since the end of the presidency, Walodimir Zelnski, his stay in this direction has become a world subject, according to ISNA.

Many believe that Zelnsky’s excuse to preve the presideial election under the pretext of war has made him no legitimacy.

“The Preside of Ukraine has been experiencing severe pressure abroad for mohs,” the English magazine Economist, referring to Zelnsky’s iernal and external pressure on Zelkski as soon as possible. Putin and Trump pressured him to hold elections in the middle of the war, and they undoubtedly believe that Ukrainian voters will be grateful to them. Six mohs ago it was thought that Zelksky was politically dead and opposed to voting. But Trump’s shameful treatme of him in March has reinforced his political position. “

Despite the widespread suppression of the opposition by the Zelksky regime and the growing opposition to its citizens with his governme, the British magazine claimed: “As the Economist polls have been registered, serious preparations for Zelksky’s victory are underway.”

Speculation about the time of election in Ukraine

Governme sources told the Economist that Zleansky had ordered its team last week to plan a full -fledged vote after the full ceasefire, which the Americans believe will be implemeed by late April.

There is currely a military rule in Ukraine and May 8 is the deadline for the Ukrainian Parliame to extend it. According to the English magazine, the abolition of martial law is the first necessary action to start the election process.

Sources reports about the exact timing of the election are differe, but most of them say that Zelksky has set summer at the time of the election. According to the Ukrainian constitution, it takes at least 2 days to advertise. But Ukrainian officials have called for at least three mohs.

Petro Poroshenko, the leader of the largest opposition party and Zlenesky’s “sworn enemy”, predicts that the election will be held between August and October.

According to him, the campaign has in fact began with Zelnsky’s coroversial decision to boycott him. It was apparely related to his long -term trial on charges of betrayal, but some believe that Poroshenko’s visit to the United States in early February, where he met with some US Preside Donald Trump’s people, made Zelksky’s decision to boycott Poroshenko.

The former Ukrainian preside has cited Zelnsky’s goal of boycotting.

According to Poroshenko, the sanctions against him are doing three things: “Rejecting his nomination and warning to Valerie Zalogen, a former general general of Ukraine and a person who has a great chance to defeat Zelnski.”

On the other hand, a senior governme official in an ierview with the Economist claimed that Zelkski would try to surprise its competitors by holding the election in July so as not to compete with its competitors by applying a short time.

The source claims that the move, in addition to helping Zelnski win the election, will “preve the coury from collapse by preveing long elections.”

But Ukraine’s opposition leaders have emphasized that the election in a short period of time will be impossible due to logistical barriers. Because millions of Ukrainian citizens are abroad. But the Economist acknowledges that the only reason for their opposition to iensive elections is not technical issues, but “they say that a fair election first needs to eliminate advertising and censorship.”

“The long shadow of Ukrainian life, Mr. Putin and Trump may not wa a fast election now,” the English magazine said. “Every five probably demanded that the elections were rapidly dismissed, but their calculations were incorrect, Zelkski may win again.”

“Putin has many cards,” the Economist added. His drones and missiles can make it impossible to abolish military rule or even hold elections. But many think that elections can help Putin destabilize Ukraine. “

“The situation for the next Ukraine Preside, whoever is, will not be easier to be elected,” the English magazine wrote. Trump’s hasty diplomacy could lead to a bad peace agreeme and dissatisfaction. Over time, some Ukrainians may call for a more strict and military governme. Zelnsky, despite all its disadvaages, is over -approved by the people to become a real dictator. “Whoever comes after him may be less cautious.”

The end of the message