Disclosure of wider US ierference in the Ukraine War; Send information and guide war
Research by the New York Times has revealed that the United States was much more involved in the Ukrainian war than previously thought. The research reveals the US hidden role in the Ukrainian war.
The Ukraine War is at a critical poi, while US Preside Donald Trump is seeking proximity to the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, and the pressure to end the war.
But almost three years before Trump’s return to power, the United States and Ukraine were involved in an unprecedeed cooperation in the field of information, strategic, planning and technology, the details of which were only clear to a limited number of US officials and their allies.
Three -year -old US -Ukraine secret cooperation; From information to military technology
The Peagon, with significa transparency, has provided a general report of $ 1.5 billion in weapons se to Ukraine. But the New York Times research shows that US involveme in the war was much deeper than previously thought. This secret cooperation led both major war strategies and conveyed accurate targeting information to Ukrainian forces on the battlefield.
The following are five importa pois from the study, which are five key facts of US -Ukraine secret cooperation.
1. The US base in Wisbaden, Germany, gave the Russian forces coordinates to the Ukrainians.
The idea behind this cooperation was that US close cooperation with Ukraine could offset Russia’s superiority in manpower and weapons. To guide the Ukrainians in using their advanced weapons, Americans created an operation called the “Dragon Mission Force”.
The US military base in Germany, Ukraine’s eye on the battlefield.
2. The secret ceer of the cooperation was in the US Army garrison in Wisbaden, Germany.
Every morning, US and Ukrainian military officers were ideifying targets; Includes Russian units, equipme or infrastructure. US ielligence ages and coalitions used satellite images, radio waves and iercepted communications to find Russian situations. “The Dragon Mission Force” then gave the Ukrainians to attack them.
The US Secret War Room in Germany determines Ukraine’s targets
1. Military officials were concerned that the Russians would be provocative direct targeting.
For this reason, instead of using the word “goals”, they used the term “favorite pois”.
Changing words to reduce sensitivity: “goals” became “favorite pois”.
1. US ielligence and artillery helped Ukraine change the war to its advaage.
In spring 1, the Biden governme agreed to send Himars missile systems that used satellite rockets for attacks up to 3 miles.
Himars, the weapon that changed the equation of the war
In the first year of the war, the Ukrainians were eirely depende on American ielligence, and the “Dragon Mission Force” approved and managed almost all Himmers’ attacks.
According to the New York Times, the US -led Himmers attacks landed the Russians.
The attacks sharply increased Russian casualties, and the Ukrainian couer -attack was successful in year 6. By December of that year, the Ukrainians had an unexpected way against Russia.
Ukrainian ‘unexpected’ victory; America was behind the scenes
1. Biden’s governme changed its red lines.
From the outset, Biden governme officials have tried to insist that the United States is not fighting Russia, but only to Ukraine. However, they were worried that their actions would incite Putin and lead him to attack NATO targets or use nuclear weapons.
Dangerous game of Washington; Help Ukraine without bootin stimulation?
Even with the increased risk of the Biden governme to help Ukraine, many sensitive measures were taken in secret.
The ban on the presence of US troops in Ukraine was reduced and the Wisbaden base was allowed to send about twelve military advisers to Kiev.
To preve public atteion, the Peagon initially called them “subject experts”. Later, the number of the team increased to three times, and military consultas were finally allowed to travel to Ukraine Command headquarters near the fro lines.
US military advisers eered Ukraine.
Disclosure of the US role in drone attacks and secret operations in Crimea and Russia
In year 4, the US Navy was allowed to share targeting information on Ukrainian drone attacks against warships in waters beyond the Crimean borders.
The US Navy behind Ukrainian UAV attacks on Russian ships?
The CIA was allowed to support Ukraine operations in the Crimean waters; In the fall of that year, the organization secretly assisted Ukrainian drones attacking Russian warships in the port of Sevastopel.
CIA’s secret operation; Guiding drone attacks to the port of Sevastopel
On January 7, US military and Ukrainian military officers designed a joi operation in Wisbaden to attack about 5 Russian military targets throughout the Crimea using long -range coalition missiles and Ukrainian drones.
US Confideial Map to hit the Russian military target in Crimea
The operation, called “Moonfire’s onslaught”, was largely forced to force the Russians to move its equipme, facilities and forces from Crimea to Russia’s main territory.
Operation “Moviasis”; Crimea became insecure for the Russians?
Crossing the red lines; Permits to attack Russian territory; Eveually, the US and the CIA were allowed to assist in attacks on Russian territory.
The toughest red line was the Russian border. But in the spring, to protect the northern city of Kharkif against the Russian invasion, the US governme permitted a “operational box”; An area of Russian territory where US officers in Wisbden could provide the Ukrainians with accurate coordinates.
Break the red line; US help to target Russian soil
The initial phase of the area covered a wide range of northern Ukraine.
The operational area expanded after the North Korean forces were dispatched to assist Russia in the Ukrainian attack.
Later, the US military was allowed to coordinate missile strikes in an area of southern Russia where the Russians had deployed forces and equipme to attack eastern Ukraine.
Mysterious drone attack on Russian ammunition warehouse; Was the CIA behind the scenes?
CIA and flexible policies; Change the rules to attack Russia; The long -standing politics preveed the CIA from providing information on targets within Russian territory. But the CIA could have requested “exceptions” that allowed specific attacks.
Military ielligence had ideified a large ammunition warehouse in the city of Torps, 4 miles north of the Ukrainian border.
On September 9, a wave of drones attacked the ammunition warehouse. The explosion was as powerful as a small earthquake and created a pit of a football field. Later, the CIA was allowed to facilitate Ukrainian drone attacks on southern Russia to slow Russian advances in eastern Ukraine.
Political differences in Ukraine; Couer -couer failure age
Political disputes in Ukraine coributed to the couerattack.
The couerattack was supposed to accelerate after the first year’s victories. But after the war maneuvers in Wisbaden and agreeing on a strategy, the plan was in trouble with Ukraine’s domestic policies.
The commander -in -chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, General Valerie Zallogen, supported the plan, whose main focus was on the southern city of Malitopel to cut off Russian supply lines. But his rival and subordinate, Alexander Sirski, had his own plan; Focusing on the siege of Russian forces in the eastern city of Bakhmut.
Ukrainian Preside Walodimir Zelkski supported Sirski and, instead of focusing on one fro, divided the ammunition and forces between the two fros. The Ukrainians could never recapture Bakhut, and within a few mohs, the couerattack failed. Russia now has the upper hand.
The end of the message
(Tagstotranslate) Ukraine War (T) America
