Obvious retreat of America after consecutive threats…! – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

Mehr News Agency, International Group: «Mohammed Ali’s impurity“Iraqi political analyst and political activist, a dedicated note entitled” Obvious US Substitution after successive threats “for the group International Mehr News Agency has sent the full text:

Sudden change of tone of Steve WitcafTrump’s special representative in the Middle East affairs surprised many. Speaking for a long time before “the need for maximum pressure” against Iran, he is now talking about “trusting” and “abolition of misunderstandings”. The obvious contradiction in the Trump administration’s policies has revealed this time in Iran’s case. A policy that began with the threat to war, but now to attempt to Negotiation And sending diplomatic messages has come. But where does this sudden change come from? Has the Trump administration come to the conclusion that the policy of maximum pressure against Iran has failed? Or this is just a tactic to buy time?

Witcaf In a television interview it announced that Trump He has sent a message to Tehran and has suggested to talk to “maintaining mutual respect”. A sentence that is a sharp difference with Mike’s threatening tone WaltzThe White House National Security Adviser has that last week said, “The Trump administration is seeking to completely dismantle Iran’s nuclear program.” Position It is quite contradictory representing the deep divide in the Trump administration’s strategy. But this First It is not time for the White House’s policies towards Iran to be confused.

When Trump in his first round of presidency Brjam He left, promising to bring Iran to the negotiating table harder. But what happened was quite the opposite; Iran not only did not surrender, but it also expanded its nuclear activities and strengthened its regional influence. At that time, the White House repeatedly emphasized that no negotiation with Iran would be held unless Tehran completely abandon its nuclear program. Now, in year 4, despite all the threats and sanctions, the US not only pursued Negotiation It is implicitly implicit in a letter sent by Trump to Iran Present It has also been reduced to initial sanctions.

This change of position Caused by The domestic situation of America knows. Trump, who is facing economic problems and public discontent, needs to introduce his foreign policy as a success. Entering a military conflict with Iran can be extremely expensive for him, so he seeks it through NegotiationPresent at least one interim agreement as an achievement. But Iran, which has the experience of agreeing with the United States in the case of the Brjam, no longer easily deceives the White House’s promises.

The supreme leader of the revolution, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in an indirect response to Trump’s message, stated that the policy of threats against Iran was not working. Tehran has repeatedly emphasized that NegotiationUnder pressure He does not accept and any dialogue must be based on mutual respect. This stance indicates that Trump’s proposal at least at this stage will not be welcomed by Iran.

But changing Trump’s tone has a clear message: White House policies against Iran have failed. This failure is not limited to diplomacy; Rather, the signs are obvious in the field of action. In recent years, the United States has worked hard to isolate Iran economically and politically, but Iran has not only been isolated, but expanded its relations with Russia, China and even some Arab countries. It is a bitter reality for Trump that has been forced to change from power to a softer position.

But does this change of position mean real retreat? Many believe that Trump continues to pursue sticks and carrots. She’s on the one hand with a diplomatic tone of Negotiation He speaks and, on the other hand, raises the threat of “military action”. This dual policy has been repeatedly observed in his government. When. Trump He sent a message of peace to North Korea, increasing the pressure of sanctions. When he spoke of the withdrawal of US troops from West Asia, he immediately dispatched more warships to the area. Now, against Iran, it has taken the same strategy.

But what is different this time is Iran’s reaction. Tehran, as in previous years, is no longer in the hope of reaching an agreement. Iranian policymakers know well that Trump Looking for a promotional show and Present Not to give real privileges. Therefore, in spite of economic pressures, Iran continues to insist on its positions.

In the meantime, American allies have also been confused. The regime Zionist He has always supported strict policies against Iran, now he looks at Trump’s change of tone. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Ben “We cannot trust any new agreement with Iran,” the regime said in response to Trump’s message. The remarks show that even close US allies are confused by the contradictions in Trump’s policies.

Also, in the United States itself, there have been sharp differences on the matter. The hard -line Republicans Lindsi Graham, against any Negotiation They are with Iran and believe that this is a dangerous retreat. On the contrary, some other American politicians believe that the continuation of the maximum pressure policy leads Iran only to more aggressive measures and that diplomacy should be given the opportunity.

In this situation, we have to see if Trump is really looking for a new agreement or is it merely trying to make Iran Under pressure Put. Experience in recent years has shown that Trump often has his policies Based on It regulates short -term personal interests and focuses less on long -term strategies. If he could, with a diplomatic show, bring the Iranian crisis to Benefit Self -finished, no doubt will do it, even if it is forced to temporarily from positions Previous To retreat.

But Iran is no longer the year actor of the year Present To enter into an agreement at any cost. Tehran, by learning from the past, is looking for any Negotiation Possibly have the upper hand and avoid American diplomatic deceit. Therefore, what is happening now, rather than a strategic change from Washington, is a tactical maneuver that will probably not produce Trump’s desired results.