Baqa’i: Security Council meeting on Iran has no technical and legal justification

Speaking to ISNA on Wednesday, Ismail Baqaei, a spokesman for the Islamic Republic of Iran, told ISNA about the purpose of Preside Donald Trump to write a letter to Iran and media the issue of writing the letter, saying: “Every politician has his own style and his style.” Why he has decided this is merely a matter that can be analyzed. We have no News about why it has become media before a letter is se. Importa is performance, and ultimately we decide on the performance of couries about our reaction.

He also said about the coe of the letter: Let’s not speculate what the coe is.

Baqaei also stated: Couries do not decide on one or more actions on that coury, each coury has a background in behavior in relation to other couries, the coury’s background and view of various iernational issues are clear. Therefore, it is natural that based on our previous experiences, our foreign policy priorities and principles, we have our own predictions, but it is not reasonable to make a decision based solely on speculation.

The trigger mechanism not only put one side exposed to pressure

A State Departme spokesman responded to the question that “tonight (Wednesday) is a Security Council meeting on the amou of enriched uranium reserves in Iran, and Mr Arakchi has described it as a heresy. Some Western analysts and media have claimed that this may be the beginning of pressure on Iran and the preparations of the trigger mechanism, what do you think? While you said at a news conference that European couries should not go to the mechanism, “he said,” European couries must realize that using any compression tool will have reactions that will certainly be harmful to their own ierests, so I don’t think they will simply come to terms with it.

“The discussion of the trigger mechanism is not to put only one side pressure,” he said. This will have consequences, and the consequences are serious for the other party given the reaction we will have.

The senior diplomat of the Islamic Republic of Iran noted: In my opinion, Mr. Minister used the most accurate word. This is a heresy. The meeting has no technical justification. Because the Iernational Atomic Energy Agency is addressing the ambiguities and questions about Iran’s peaceful nuclear activities, and there is a specific cooperation program between Iran and the Agency based on iernational obligations, sanctification and NPT.

“Our rights and duties are clear and there is no justification for the issue at the Security Council level,” he said. It is clear to us that this issue is on the agenda due to US pressure and unfortunately some European couries. Such political clashes with technical issues will certainly not help the opposite parties and may make the matter more complicated, but because we are confide of the nature of our nuclear program and we are confide that the discussions that have been raised from the beginning, from the beginning of the year, were quite clear that it was a political excuse, and no claims. The atomic has done its job on the basis of legal frameworks, and therefore, in our view, there is no justification for the issue to be raised in the curre situation in the UN Security Council.

The purpose of the Security Council meeting is the media space

Baqa’i responded to a question, “Will a resolution be issued at the meeting?” He said, “No, they are just about to discuss this.”

“That is why there is no basis on this, and China and Russia are completely opposed to this issue in the Security Council,” he said. It seems more that the goal is to make media and psychological space for pressure.

The next meeting with Europeans will be at an undergraduate level

A State Departme spokesman also responded to a question about this ai -Iranian move, given that Iran’s talks with three European couries coinue, as well as the horizon of Iranian talks with Europeans, said: “Negotiation is a process and with one or two sessions it is not going to end a discussion or say or did not come to fruition.” With the three European couries, they are legally members, and Brajam is still a docume that is existed to the Security Council Resolution; So we are in consta coact with them. The next meeting will be at the undergraduate level, as we are going to eer some of the more detailed aspects of the previous periods at the level of political deputies or political managers of the three couries.

He coinued: With China and Russia, both couries are members of the Brigham and were prese in all negotiations, he said. In cases where they were not prese, we informed them about conversations with European parties. As they were, if there was a discussion of Iran’s nuclear issue, they will let us know. So we were in talks with all the parties to the Brotherhood all these years. This is a sign of our goodness and seriousness that we are confide that our nuclear program is peaceful. They have no doubt, as the Agency, as a caregiver, has the necessary access to the peaceful nature of the nuclear program of couries.

Beijing’s meeting is part of a coinuous process and nothing new

Baqa’i also said about the joi meeting of Iran, Russia and China on Friday in Beijing and “whether the proposal was from Iran or the opposite parties”. This is a coinuation of a process. This time it is organized in terms of form and is not just about the nuclear issue.

A spokesman for the Iranian diplomacy said: “We have coinuous consultations with both couries within regional and iernational frameworks, for example in the framework of Brix and Shanghai and consulting on regional and iernational developmes.” Therefore, this opportunity is used to discuss a range of topics, and it is natural that the nuclear issue is one of its main topics.

How far we are from holding a meeting of the Joi Commission?

Responding to a question about “how far we do we have with a joi meeting with Russia, China and Europeans,” he said, “They (Europeans and Russia) have their own positions because of the Ukrainian conflict, and we have not had a meeting within the framework of the Joi Commission.” But we do our job, and we consider all of these couries to be a member of the Brotherhood, and we think consulting with all of them, including China and Russia, is useful because it is a joi agreeme between these several couries.

The full text of this conversation will be published in the coming days.

The end of the message