Hamas response to the New York Times media mischief about Resistance Weapon – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Palestinian news agency quoted Palestine News Agency as saying The Hamas Islamic Resistance Moveme issued a stateme in response to statemes attributed to Musa Abu Razogh that media statemes about the remarks were not true.

The Hamas moveme issued a stateme in response to a stateme attributed to Musa Abu Mazuq that media statemes in the ierview with the New York Times were inaccurate on February 7 (March 6). .

Hamas added: This ierview was carried out a few days ago and Released statemes do not reflect the full responses provided Rather, these statemes are out of the main coext of the ierview and corary to the issues.

Based on Hamas report, Abu Razogh has emphasized that Operation October 5 (Storm of Al -Aqsa) reflects the Palestinian people’s right to resist the occupation and siege, and the occupiers are responsible for the genocide in Gaza.

Hamas also said that Abu Razogh He emphasized the consta positions of the Palestinian moveme and the right of the Palestinian people to resist uil the destruction of the occupiers, adding that it adheres to the right of the Palestinian people to use various forms of resistance, especially armed resistance.
The group also added that Abu Dharzuq also emphasized that the weapon of resistance was the right of the Palestinian nation and aimed at protecting the Palestinian people and its sanctities, and it will not be possible to withdraw from it uil the occupation against Palestinian lands.

Hazm Qasim spokesman for the Hamas movemeStatemes attributed to Moses Abu Razogh He rejected and emphasized the legitimacy and negligence of the resistance weapon.

He reiterated that Hamas adheres to the weapon of resistance as a legitimate tool and that this will not be negotiated uil the occupation of the Palestinian territories.

A spokesman for the Hamas Moveme added: Abu RazoghHamas’s official stance is not.

Qassim also condemned the destructive and aggressive measures of the occupiers in numerous wars against the nations of the region, especially in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

Ismail Rezwan Other Hamas leaders also accused the occupiers of trying to escape the ceasefire agreeme, insisting that the weapon of resistance is a red line that cannot be negotiated.

He urged the mediation to put pressure on the occupiers to fully impleme the agreeme.

New York Times quoted Abu Razogh Claimed that Hamas had no previous information on the October 5 attack plan.

This US media has claimed that Abu Razogh He said: If I knew that October 5 would have such a widespread destruction, I would have preveed it.

Based on Claim the New York Times, “Abu Mazuq Moss was unaware of the details of the plan, but he agreed with the general strategy of the Israeli attack.

In addition, the New York Times quotes from Abu Razogh He claimed that Hamas is ready to negotiate his weapon’s future.