Washington-Masko’s unnecessary treaties: How did the US violate the four agreements? – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

‌Mehr News Agency, International Group: During the few weeks of Donald Trump’s reliance on US presidential heads, the market for debate about possible Tehran-Washington talks is hot; Negotiations that have previously began indirectly and led to a “comprehensive agreement of the Joint Action” (Brjam), but Trump out of its first presidency, despite Iran’s constructive cooperation, withdrawn and the most severe sanctions. Anti -Iranian Imposed on Tehran in the form of “maximum pressure”.

In this connection, the Supreme Leader of the Revolution on Friday morning (February 5th) with the Air Force commanders and staff staff and the Army Air Defense Experience “Two Years Negotiation And they considered the concession and the shortage but the failure to do so, “and added:” The United States violated the same treaty despite its deficiencies. ” So, Negotiation With such a non -agitated state, abnormally, and Unborn Is and with it should not Negotiation Kurdish.

In addition to the brigade, with a historical look at US commitments and treaties with other countries in the world, it can be found to be useless and even harmful to these conversations that numerous and violated US treaties with Russia are an example of those.

Washington-Masko’s unnecessary military treaties

US -Russian relations and the previous Soviet Union have always been competing and in many cases violations of bilateral agreements. Since the Cold War, the two countries have signed numerous treaties, a large number of which have been violated by the United States; The treaties that will be examined in this article;

1. Anti -ballistic missiles (Abm) – 1

Missile Treaty Anti -flying (Anti-Ballistic Missile), signed between the United States and the Soviet Union in 2008, pursued the goal of restricting the development and deployment of missile defense systems. The treaty specifically restricted each country to only two missile defense systems that were later reduced to one system. The main purpose of the agreement was to prevent unilateral superiority and maintain strategic balance between the two nuclear powers, as the widespread development of missile defense systems could eliminate the concept of mutual deterrence and create new arms race.

However, in year 3, the government of George W. Bush unilaterally withdrew the treaty, citing the need to develop missile defense systems against potential threats by third countries. The move led to a strong Russian reaction, as Russian authorities described the withdrawal as a violation of strategic agreements and the threat to nuclear balance. Following the move, Russia also expanded its plans to develop advanced missile systems such as supersonic systems, which intensified the arms competition between the two countries.

2. Nuclear (INF) 1

Intermediate-Rang Nuclear Forces Treaty in the year between the United States and the Soviet Union for the purpose of Eliminate Ballistic and cruise missiles were signed with a range of 1 to 2 kilometers. The deal was one of the most important weapons control treaties during the Cold War, which helped reduce nuclear tensions between the two superpowers. Based on The treaty pledged not only to avoid producing and deploying these missiles, but also destroy existing missiles. The treaty was recognized as a turning point in reducing the arms competition between the East and the West and led to future weapons agreements such as the start.

But in year 2, the Donald Trump administration announced that the United States would be withdrawn because of what Russian violated the treaty. The United States claimed that Russia had developed and deployed new missiles beyond the scope of the contract, but Moscow denied the allegations, announcing that the United States had not provided any credible evidence for the claim.

The US withdrawal from the treaty led Russia to declare that it would no longer adhere to its obligations. The move has raised global concerns about the return of arms competition and increased nuclear threats, as the cancellation of the treaty allowed the two countries to deploy their nuclear mid -range missiles without restrictions. Also, some experts believe that the US withdrawal from the deal was an excuse for the development and deployment of new missiles in Asia and Europe that exacerbated tensions with Russia and China. The decision had widespread consequences on international security and increased the likelihood of a new arms competition.

1. Oral agreement on the expansion of NATO – 1

During the German re -alliance negotiations in 2008, Soviet authorities sought to receive guarantees that NATO would not be expanded east. During the talks, then -US Secretary of State James Baker said during a meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand “not an inch to the east.” The commitment was repeated in other diplomatic conversations by some Western officials, prompting the Soviet Union to agree to the German re -alliance of NATO membership.

But contrary to this promise, NATO continued to east in the late 1980s, and Eastern European countries, including Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and the Baltic States, joined the military treaty. The development came as Russia has repeatedly protested and described it as a violation of Western authorities’ oral obligations.

The spread of NATO has been one of the key factors in tensions between Russia and the West as the current crisis of Ukraine, as Moscow considers the move a direct threat to its security. Russia believes that by expanding its borders, NATO has changed the balance of power to its detriment and has provided conditions for Western military interventions in Russian -influenced areas. With all these concerns, Russia still fueled tensions with Moscow in the last year with the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO.

1. The Open Heavens Treaty (Ost) 1

The Open Skies Treaty, signed in year 6, was one of the most important international agreements for the creation of military transparency among member states. The treaty allows signatories to conduct unarmed identification flights over each other to gather information on the movements and military activities of the other party. The main purpose of the treaty was to reduce suspicions, prevent unwanted conflicts, and build trust between countries, especially between the United States and Russia. The agreement served as a key tool for monitoring military and verification of arms control commitments and participated in more than 5 countries.

However, in year 2, the Donald Trump administration announced that the United States would withdraw from the treaty, citing Russia’s violations of commitments. The United States claimed that Russia had imposed some restrictions on identification flights in certain areas, including around the Kaliningrad area and near Georgian borders. In contrast, Russia rejected the allegations and insisted that all oversight flights were carried out in accordance with the Treaty Regulations. According to Russian officials, US withdrawal from the treaty was a move to undermine military transparency and increase distrust among world powers. Russia also warned that the decision could increase tensions and military competition.

Following the departure of the United States, Russia announced that if the United States had not returned to the treaty, it may also be withdrawn, because the presence of a treaty that one of the most important members is no longer committed to implementing it would be of no value. Finally, in year 2, Russia also decided to withdraw from the treaty, and the deal was virtually ineffective. The departure of the US and then Russia from the open skyscrapers was one of the important signs of reducing military cooperation and increasing geopolitical tensions between the two countries whose impact on international security continues.

Will the US also go back to Nostart?

The Start (Strategic Nuclear Weapons Treaty) Treaty was signed for the first time between the United States and the Soviet Union, with the main purpose of reducing the number of strategic nuclear weapons and preventing more nuclear weapons competition. The treaty focused on the reduction of continental ballistic missiles (ICBMS), submarine cruise missiles (SLBMS), and strategic bombers. With the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the deal became a founder for new nuclear relations between the United States and Russia. The Start Treaty was valid by year 3 and then ended.

In year 2, a new treaty, New Start, was signed between the US and Russia. The agreement restricts the number of strategic weapons per country to 4 nuclear warheads to continue the process of reducing nuclear weapons and reduces the number of missile launch systems to 4. The treaty also includes significant measures for transparency and supervision, including periodic inspections of the two countries’ nuclear facilities. New Start was designed to boost strategic stability and prevent the dangers of post -Cold War nuclear war.

The United States has not excluded from the New Start Treaty to date, and this treaty is valid until year 4, unless renewed or modified. However, US -Russian relations have become more complicated in recent years, and in various periods, some US officials have threatened to exit the treaty or reduce commitments.

The end of the word

In various governments, the United States has repeatedly left its bilateral agreements with Russia or somehow violated them. These measures have not only led to the intensification of arms competition and increased mistrust between the two countries, but also raised wider concerns over the future of international security.

Examples such as exit from the missile treaty Anti -flying And the Nuclear Missile Prohibition Treaty, which directly influenced the nuclear balance and strategic security between the two superpowers, as well as the NATO’s expansion promised not to expand it to the East, are just some of the serious challenges in US relations. And Russia has created. This situation has not only led to new weapons competition, but it has also created deeper dissatisfaction and gaps among major countries.

Ultimately, these trends can lead to a more unstable and more dangerous world, as international relations are based on trust and common commitments, and their violations can lose global stability and return to cold and stressful competitions.

Now, with this compliance case, the question comes to the question of how to deal with the United States, especially Trump, but not only from the Brajam but also from various treaties with Russia, such as the open skies and the ban on the mid-range nuclear missiles. Found?