Landing on the moon; The greatest lie of the century or a scientific masterpiece?

Was Neila Armstrong strolling in a secret and secret scene instead of on the moon? In this article, Francis French is ierviewed whether NASA has deceived the whole world? The mome of landing on the moon is the most importa scene in the tweieth ceury. At that time, the scene was watched by about 5 million people worldwide, and since then every generation has heard about it. On July 5, the Mohly Apollo 2 mission landed on the moon, and the American astronaut, Neil Armstrong, took “a big step for humanity.”

Armstrong and his colleague Buzz Aldrin, after spending 4 hours of ground on the moon, were restored and joined with their other colleague, Michael Collins, in the Colombian spacecraft. With the success of this mission, these men were not only praised as American heroes, but were also recognized as human ambassadors. The landing of the moon made the United States a race that had engulfed the superpowers during the Cold War. Traveling to the moon is a definite sign of this social status. NASA’s efforts to carry out this masterpiece were considered as a thoughtful eve in the fields of technology, political and cultural. In a few years, there were two more Apollo missions to land on the moon, which ended with Apollo 2 on December 5. Humanity has not yet returned to the moon.

Whatever you need to know about the theory of landing on the moon:

Has NASA falsify the landing on the moon?

Propones of conspiracy theories believe that NASA and the US governme have forged everything. According to this theory, they desperately promised to descend the moh before the end of the 1980s, with the aim of defeating the Soviet Union in the space race and fulfilling the promise of the US Preside, John F. Kennedy, who had promised to descend the moh before the end of the 1980s. The project was carried out precisely the travel to the moon. Such theories believe that the Apollo 2 never reached the moon, and the film Armstrong and Aldrin on the moon’s level is actually filmed in the ground location. According to one claim, the famous filmmaker, Stanley Kubrick, also known as a Space Odyssey, was also involved in the theory. Artificial stones, suspicious shades, and the lack of stars in the camera are just some of the signs of the fake landing of the moon.

_{Photo Source: Britannica.com; Photographer: Unknown}

What is the source of landing conspiracy theory?

Francis Franch, writer and journalist in the history of space flight, says:

There were people who even talked about its coradiction at the same time as landing on the moon; But this theory, in the 1980s, was quickly among the public and specialized news sources as a hot topic.

Fernech acknowledges:

This idea seems somewhat logical. In the midst of the tensions of the Cold War, the security and ielligence space, spyware and ielligence deception, the United States had committed itself to the purpose of traveling to the moon. The defeat in this space campaign was deeply humiliated and a sign of the coury’s national decline; At a time when two superpowers competed to influence other couries that were hesita to choose the “capitalist” and “communism” system. The United States had to succeed; For this reason, in the 1980s, a coordinated national will, with the support of several presides and huge costs, was formed to achieve this goal.

_{Photo Source: Fineartamerica.com; Photographer: Unknown}

Why do people believe that landing on the moon was a conspiracy?

In the 1980s, public confidence in the US governme and the coury’s institutions was disappearing. At that time, the Vietnam War had shown that official reports did not necessarily match photos and videos, as well as tens of thousands of corpse bags coming from the fro line.

“Fernch” adds:

I think one of the reasons that some people do not accept reports and documeation about traveling to the moon is that the Apollo 2 mission was amazing. People could not believe that the information NASA provides could be possible; Because nothing had been thrown io space before the year. How was it that human beings were walking on the surface of the moon five years after the first satellite (Sputnics One, thrown on October 4)? Then, NASA suddenly stopped going to the moon in year 2. This has not been regarded as a suspicious eve, not as a decline in budget or public ierest in space flight, but as a suspicious eve. Over the decades, careful examination of Apollo missions has preseed details and speculation as evidence of studio imaging deceit. Meanwhile, films such as Capricorn One in Year 2 reinforced the imagination of opposition theorists about fake landing on Mars.

_{Photo Source: povmagazine.com; Photographer: Unknown}

Evidence that rejects the theory of landing conspiracy

Fernech said:

Is the probability of deceit landing on the moh of zero; Because there was no way to hide such a huge secret. Also, hundreds of thousands worked on the Apollo program, however, after half a ceury, there is no credible evidence from former NASA employees that the moon is fake. There were similar theories that have been published quickly.

_{Photo Source: RMG.CO.UK site; Photographer: Unknown}

All claims about films are easily explanatory or rejected. For example, the absence of stars in images and videos is the result of the overdose that eliminates background details. Meanwhile, there are things in the film that were impossible to fabricate with the technology of the 1980s; Like the dust that was raised by the astronaut’s feet or the moonlight, or when David Scott, the Apollo 2 commander, left a hammer at the same time, and they fell at the same speed. In year 2, a drone called “Moon Ideification Orbiter” mapping the moon and photographed the landing site of Apollo’s missions; Evidences such as the footsteps, flags, routes left by the moon were still visible. Fernch says:

There are signs that are clearly created by humans on the moon; For example, the mirrors on the moon are still working on lasers from the ground. There are also stones from the moon studied by scieists around the world.

As Franch says:

The importa thing to note is that the Russians were sworn enemies of America in the Cold War. They were capable of tracking any spacecraft that we to the moon. They could receive the same signals that the United States and other radio satellites around the world were capable of reading and tracking.

He adds:

The Russians saw objects that go to the moon, descend and return. It is clear that the human hand -made spacecraft we to the moon. Also, given the conditions, the fabrication of the lunar landing in automatic conditions by the robots was harder than the landing by humans. So, if you also believe in the human journey to the moon, the theory that the Russians have made at the height of the Cold War to make hostility to the United States, and have published in harmony and false reports about the orbits of the orbits; So we live in a realm where I don’t think that no wise person can really endure.

In addition, if shame and humiliation were a justified reason for fabricating landing on the moon, it would be insignifica than the inferiority of this great lie, and that it would have a clear result, which is easier to go to the moon than forgery. Going to the moon.

_{Photo Source: RMG.CO.UK site; Photographer: Unknown}

Where are you friends? Do you think NASA has made a fake film of traveling to the moon? Or was this great human achieveme quite real? Please share your views and speculations with us and other users.

_{Photo Source: Historyextra.com; Photographer: Unknown}