Behind the scenes of endless conflicts in Africa
Western colonialists eered Africa under the pretext of promoting democracy or confroing autocratic powers, but in reality, they had the ieion of plundering the mineral and oil resources of this coine.
According to RCO News Agency, in an article referring to the colonial actions of Western couries in the African coine, the Russian media investigated the ierveions of these couries in the iernal affairs of African couries, an ierveion that is mainly carried out under the guise of humanitarian operations or under the name of promoting democracy.
According to “Rasha Today”, in the post-colonial era, we are witnessing the open and hidden ierveion of Western powers in the iernal affairs of independe couries. African couries, which have rich resources, are caught in geopolitical schemes in which foreign actors, under the pretext of a coma, are busy glorifying and secretly supporting rebels and political factions.
During the colonial era, the Western couries supported the curres that spread colonial ideas in the colonies through military aid and military training.
One of the most obvious examples of this was the support of the United States to “Joseph Desiree Mobutu” in the Democratic Republic of Congo, then called “Zaire”. “George W. Bush” described him as one of the most valuable friends of the United States. Mobutu was the chief of army staff and mastermind of a military coup in 1960 that led to the ousting of Zaire’s elected prime minister, Patrice Lumumba.
Mobutu ruled Zaire from 1965 to 1997, amassing a fortune of more than $6 billion thanks to US support. This is while the American financial aid was not to improve the living conditions of the people of this coury, because the widespread corruption and suppression of political oppones during Mobutu’s rule had made him very unpopular among the people of his coury.
“George Bush” and “Mobutu” in the White House
The cost of dealing with the Soviet Union
According to Rasha Today, the main reason America supported Mobutu was that he was against the influence of the Soviet Union. At that time, the Soviet Union supported liberation movemes in Africa; Among them from “Frelimo” in Mozambique, “Nelson Mandela” in South Africa and Patrice Lumumba in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
America’s support for ai-Soviet movemes in Africa we as far as the assassination of Patrice Lomba, the traces of Belgium and the American Ceral Ielligence Agency (CIA).
“Maurice Robert”, the former minister of African affairs in the French governme, says that corary to the fact that some people try to show these actions as reactive in nature, in fact such actions are organized and planned.
“An operation of this scale involves several steps,” he says. Collecting and analyzing information, developing an operational plan based on this information, studying and applying logistic tools and taking steps to impleme the plan.
Referring to the French ierveionist operation in 1960 to destabilize Guinea in response to the establishme of an ai-colonial governme, he says: “To destabilize our coury, the French used the Guinean exiles who had taken refuge in Senegal, as well as the organized opposition under the supervision of We used French experts. We armed and trained these people to create an atmosphere of insecurity in Guinea and to overthrow the governme if possible.”
According to Rasha Today, the couries that have created this chaos leave the scene at the slightest sign of chaos and leave the conflicting factions alone, as was seen in the Rwandan genocide, the Sudanese conflict and the Libyan crisis.
Ahmed Skotore, the first preside of Guinea
NATO’s open and hidden connection with the African crisis
Former US Preside Barack Obama supported rebel groups that sought to overthrow the governme of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. This support, which included large-scale arms transfers through third parties, violated UN Security Council Resolution 1970; A resolution based on which the sending of weapons to any of the conflicting factions in Libya was prohibited in 2011.
The transfer of these weapons inside Libya by the rebels, which eveually led to the overthrow of Gaddafi, was not a secret from NATO member couries. In only one instance, a Canadian ship stationed in the Mediterranean Sea to monitor the implemeation of UN Resolution 1970 allowed the ship to pass despite the knowledge of arms smuggling by a rebel tugboat, violating the UN resolution.
The UN Security Council later approved another resolution number 1973, according to which it authorized all necessary measures to protect civilians in Libya. This resolution was mainly supported by the United Kingdom, France and the United States, and due to the ambiguity in it, Brazil, China, Russia, India and Germany did not agree to ratify it.
According to Rasha Today, these ambiguities indicated the hidden colonial motives of some of the supporters of this resolution, and this may explain why France recognized the National Transitional Council of the Libyan opposition as the legitimate governme of this coury even before Gaddafi was killed.
Barack Obama’s speech
Colonialism under the guise of humanitarian ierveion
According to the 2016 report of the British Parliame, during the presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy, France pursued five main goals in Libya: obtaining a greater share of Libyan oil, increasing French influence in North Africa, improving Sarkozy’s domestic political situation in France, providing An opportunity for the French military to consolidate its position in the world, and address concerns raised about Gaddafi’s long-term plans to cut France’s hand out of Africa.
According to the Russian media, despite NATO’s widespread propaganda about “humanitarian ierveion” in Libya under the cover of iernational law, the ieions of some member states such as France seem coradictory to this poi of view, and the motives behind NATO’s actions in Libya are under discussion.
In a speech in 2011, Putin, who was the prime minister of Russia at the time, strongly criticized NATO’s actions and said: “When the whole so-called civilized society attacks a small coury with all its might and destroys the infrastructure built over generations. It destroys, I don’t think this is good. I don’t like that.”
Putin also said that the secondary UN resolution merely invited Western couries to come to the stage and do whatever they wa.
According to the report, Libya was undoubtedly caught in a tangle of behind-the-scenes coalitions with ulterior motives and clandestine arms deals, deals that took place under the guise of iernational law. Perhaps this is why, despite years of civil war that has devastated this former economic powerhouse of the African coine, killing many and displacing hundreds of thousands of civilians, there is almost no accouability mechanism against the foreign forces that sparked the crisis. Not employed.
end of message
