The attacks of the Zionist regime on Syria and the meaningful silence of “Erdogan” and “Al-Jolani” – Mehr News agency RCO News Agency

Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: The aerial and artillery attacks of the Zionist regime army on the military infrastructures, bases and equipme of the Syrian army are unprecedeed in their kind. After the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s governme in Syria, Israel has carried out more than 300 attacks against Syrian fortifications and military equipme. Therefore, the importa question is: why Israel in a comprehensive and wide way, the military ceers of Syria targeted And what scenario does it follow?
Reuters reports and Russia Elium, suggestive of this At the same time as the air strikes, several villages and towns in the southern suburbs of Damascus were occupied by the Zionist forces. The advance of the Zionists in the southern suburbs of Damascus near the border of Lebanon and moving towards Khan al-Sheikh and Qatna It shows that Netanyahu was to seize the opportunity and even threaten Damascus. In addition, several attacks of aerial bombardme and drone attacks of the Zionist regime have targeted the military facilities of the Syrian army.
The air attacks of the Zionist military on three strategic Syrian air bases and sites near Damascus, Homs and Qamishli and the attack on the Syrian army fortifications in the coastal city of Latakia are meaningful actions that should not be ignored. But Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, without referring to these importa attacks, only poied the finger at the Golan and claimed: “As I explained to the members of the Security Council, we are responding to the security threat on the Syrian-Israeli border and the danger which was created for our citizens, we took limited and temporary measures.
Another importa aspect of Netanyahu’s provocative actions in Syria is the occupation of Mou Hermon, which is at a height 2814 meters has made the Syrian-Lebanon border appear as a legitimate target. This mouain is known as the highest peak in the east of the Mediterranean Sea and has great strategic importance.
From Golan to Damascus
Previously, the Zionist regime pretended to consider the Golan Heights as an importa turning poi and a military threat to its survival. But now it has attacked places that basically have nothing to do with the borders of the occupied territories. This means that the Zionist regime is seriously seeking to destroy Syria’s defense power, and this Arab coury will face major security problems in the medium term. However, the Tahrir al-Sham terrorist group is sile about Israel’s open aggression and is not ready to react.
One of the insidious actions of Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of the Zionist regime in rece days, is that he has claimed that the agreeme that was formed in 1974 between Israel and Syria is now irreleva and he will not adhere to it. For this reason, Israel has se its troops to the Golan. The forces of the Zionist regime have been prese in the occupied Golan in a situation where the United Nations has criticized this occupation action and stressed the necessity of implemeing the clauses of the agreeme. 1974 and maiaining the stability of the Golan has emphasized.
It is clear that the United Nations is well aware of Israel’s immoral and occupying practice. That is why he has announced that his forces will remain in this area. Stephen Dujarric, the spokesperson of the United Nations, has also considered the presence of the Zionists in the three pois of the Golan to be corary to the 1974 agreeme and has condemned it. Also, Hezbollah of Lebanon, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Yemen and Iran also condemned the occupation of the buffer zone with Syria.
The previous procedures of the Zionist regime have shown that Tel Aviv is firstly seeking to expropriate and exploit new regional opportunities, and secondly, it is not even unlikely to attack the UN peacekeeping forces; In the situation where the spokesperson of these forces said: “Uil the Security Council changes our mission, we will remain stationed in our bases in the Golan.”
An excuse, a sophistry
A look at the news and reports of the American and European English-language media shows that there is a clear collusion and coordination between the United States and the Zionist regime in order to justify the air attack on the Syrian military facilities. The Associated Press quoted the US Ceral Command (CECOM) as saying that in addition to the Israeli attacks, the Americans themselves have attacked 80 pois. Gideon Sa’er, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Zionist regime, said: “We are targeting suspected Syrian weapons sites so that they do not fall io the hands of the enemies.” The Financial Times newspaper also announced in a report that the leaders of the Zionist regime believe that despite the fall of the Assad governme, Iran and Lebanon’s Hezbollah still have influence in Syria. Trying to destroy the missile warehouses and taking pre-emptive measures to preve the misuse of advanced weapons by the Syrian opposition are unacceptable explanations of the Zionist regime in justifying the said attacks.
Why are Jolani and Erdogan sile?
The day when the terrorists under Jolani’s command attacked the consulate of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Aleppo, apart from the flag of Palestine, they insulted and disrespected every other symbol and symbol and started such a show as if they are only hostile to Iran but support Palestine. But now that the greatest enemy of the Palestinians has attacked a place that is supposed to be the territory of the terrorists’ authority, they do not raise a voice. Therefore, the inaction of Jolani and his companions can be a clear sign of the possibility of collusion and a previous agreeme between him and Netanyahu so that the Syrian defense forces will be completely destroyed and Syria will be forced to rely on the Zionist regime to provide its defense forces from now on. , America and Turkey.
Turkey, as an activist and provocateur that has been involved in arming Tahrir al-Sham and other terrorists and has openly supported rece developmes, has remained sile against Israel’s airstrikes and has shown that it has no objection to the curre situation. All this is while the military authorities of the Zionist regime are not only proceeding in the direction of coinuing hostility with the Islamic Republic of Iran and exerting pressure on the axis of resistance, but in the next stages, they will also harm the security of Syria and Turkey. It remains to be seen what position Türkiye and Tahrir al-Sham will take against Netanyahu’s hostile actions in the future course of developmes.



