Change of Russia’s nuclear doctrine and confusion in the Western camp – Mehr News Agency | RCO News Agency

Mehr News Agency – Iernational Group: The new decree of Russian Preside Vladimir Putin to change the nuclear doctrine of his coury is an importa step that deterrence and defense principles to update has eered a new phase.

Following Russia’s new decisions, America closed its embassy in Kiev, the capital of Ukraine, and asked its employees to take shelter in a suitable place. For this reason, political analysts say that we have reached a poi that can be considered one of the highest pois of tension between Russia and the West in the last fifty years. This action of Moscow took place in a situation where the last The days of Joe’s rule BidenAmerica and its allies are looking for another battle and by provoking and arming Ukraine, they have put this tired and damaged Black Sea coury in the most difficult situation possible.

Biden For the first time, he has allowed Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russia, and this is the same action that could lead to the risk of a major world war; Especially in the era when Russia, without flattery or appeaseme, showed off its power by planning to change the nuclear doctrine. Now we can clearly say that NATO is led by a failed team of advisers Bidenhas faced the world with new threats and on the other side, Russia has also shown that it not only has no ieion to compromise and compromise against the movemes of the West; Rather, he can think about defense with more power than before.

Perhaps the day the Kremlin spokesman spoke about the possibility of changing Russia’s nuclear doctrine, the Western world did not believe that this decision of the Moscow authorities would be implemeed very soon. Dimitri Pskov He said: “In the eyes of Russia, nuclear weapons have always been considered as a deterre tool and we have tried to think of this weapon only in situations where the last The solution is necessary.”

What changes?

Russia’s previous nuclear doctrine was approved in 2020, and now after 4 years, Vladimir Putin felt the need to show that he has a special strategic attitude towards the missile actions of Ukraine and its Western allies by proposing a new nuclear doctrine and implemeing some new reforms. In this docume, for the first time, the term “poteial enemy” and threat poteial is used and it is declared that Moscow reserves the right to use this type of weapons.

If we wa to poi out the most importa principle of Russia’s defense docume, we should put our hands on this phrase: “Aggression against Russia and its allies will be punished and punished, which is unavoidable.” although Clearly; meaning Russia is specific to the term “ally”, the coury of Belarus, but the circle of this concept may be wider. Russia has announced that the use of long-range missiles by Ukraine, precisely, is under coinuous monitoring by Russian defense and security institutions.

News and reports insert In Sputnik and other Russian media, the Kremlin Palace, while announcing its new decisions to change the nuclear doctrine, emphasizes the use of this seence: “Russia’s policy in the field of nuclear deterrence is defensive in nature.” In addition to maiaining security and Territorial iegrity Russia, the defense of the allies are also emphasized and two importa goals are meioned as the vital pillars of this docume:

1. Nuclear deterrence in military conflicts.

2. Stop military actions only in subject to Guaraee this subject It is the terms of the post-war agreeme, according to Russia acceptable and guaraee the national ierests of this coury.

It seems that Russia’s emphasis on “conditions acceptable“, which means that Moscow is never under load an agreeme It will not return the situation of Ukraine to the pre-war period guaraor The membership of this coury in NATO.

What do other US allies say?

One of the importa pois about rece eves is that Jo Biden The Preside of the United States, to be exact License time The use of long-range missiles to Zelensky He said that he has ensured the defeat of the candidate supported by his party! In other words, if KamalaHarris And the Democratic Party would have won the rece elections. Biden He still preferred to walk with a cane. But now that he and his deputy have failed and they actually wa to leave a legacy of heavier failures for Donald Trump. This is while Issuing the license to use American Atcoms long-range missiles creates greater tensions, which can cause not only America, but also all NATO members to face new problems.

C. TV channel reports. it. it and newspaper daily Mail has shown that after America, England has also thought of provoking Ukraine more and more. “Storm Shadow” (meaning the shadow of the storm) made in England, with a range of less than 155 Mile is known as a new-generation mine-crushing bomb that will be used as a strategic and expensive weapon only in special situations. If the permission to use it is also issued, the conditions ahead will become more difficult and complicated; Especially if it becomes possible to use American mines to couer Russia’s advance in eastern Ukraine. This action may, on the one hand, encourage German Chancellor Olaf Schultz to put the permission to use “Taurus” missiles on Zelensky’s table, and on the other hand, force Russia to respond and react in the field. Kerr Starmer, Prime Minister of England at the meeting of the group 20 “We must not let Putin win this war,” he said in Rio de Janeiro. But it is clear that Starmer’s words have not received much support.

An excuse called North Korea

One of the excuses of the United States and its Western allies for issuing a license for the Ukrainian army to use long-range missiles and attack deep io Russian territory is the military cooperation between the military under Putin and North Korea. The West believes that it should react to this action of Russia as soon as possible. All this while Ukraine, during the rece war, received help from all NATO members and the increase in military cooperation between Russia and North Korea is not an issue that is far from expected..

The evidence shows that taking an immediate stance against North Korea is just a pretext, as Biden’s advisers remember well that Donald Trump, in his first term in office, has ieracted and compromised with North Korea. He considered North Korea esseial and now it is possible that his return to the White House will pave the way for renegotiating talks with Pyongyang and further weakening NATO.

According to the officials of the Russian governme, the decisions of the US and other NATO members to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of non-nuclear couries is a military risk and threat. Russia has declared that nuclear deterrence as the coury’s most importa defense doctrine is coinuously prioritized in peacetime, in times of threat of aggression and in times of war, with the participation of deterre military ages including land, sea and air forces. It remains to be seen what the new American governme will do in the face of the crisis created by Joe Biden and NATO.