Zelensky’s unveiling of the “Victory Plan” by accusing Iran, China and North Korea

According to RCO News Agency, Ukrainian Preside Volodymyr Zelensky in rece weeks, in numerous meetings with his European and American allies, sought to attract increasing support from these couries, but according to American media reports, Zelensky failed to create “ehusiasm” among his allies. It has failed to support Kiev.

Nevertheless, the American network “CNN” this evening announced the unveiling of Zelensky’s “coroversial victory plan” and wrote: “This plan, which consists of five specific clauses and three confideial clauses, is iended to create a bridge between Moscow and Kiev and “Peace negotiations are the future.”

According to this American network, The three confideial clauses will be shared only “with specific allies of Kyiv”.

Zelensky’s main demand in his victory plan, which claims to “end the war in Ukraine as soon as possible”, is “membership in NATO”. But as CNN reports, Even Ukraine’s closest allies, the United States and European couries, are against the idea of ​​Ukraine joining NATO as long as the coury is at war with Russia, because if Ukraine joins NATO, “the member states will be forced to directly iervene in the war against Russia.” will be

On the other hand, one of the main reasons for the start of the war in Ukraine, according to Russian officials, is Ukraine’s desire to join NATO. As a result, the main demand of the preside of Ukraine in his “victory” plan, according to CNN, is nothing but “false hope” and “iensification of conflicts”.

In other parts, Zelenskiy’s victory plan is also meioned at his request to increase Ukraine’s defense capabilities and help the coury’s economy. He said to his allies: “If we impleme the victory plan right now, the war will end by next year.”

Zelensky’s claim has also attracted the atteion of the CNN expert, as the analyst of this network said in his report: “The claim of the preside of Ukraine is that many parts of the victory plan have been implemeed by Ukraine or are completely impossible and will not help to end the war.”

Previously, Zelenskiy unveiled his victory plan during his meeting with US Preside Joe Biden in September. During the visit of the Preside of Ukraine to the United States, the Biden administration agreed to an aid worth 375 million dollars to Ukraine, but opposed Zelensky’s request to attack deep io Russia using Western weapons.

Before the final day of the unveiling of Ukraine’s victory plan, Zelensky shared this plan with the leaders of England, France, Italy, Germany, and NATO Secretary General, and none of the officials of the releva couries and NATO supported this plan.

* Uselessness of European spending for Ukraine

On the other hand, earlier, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters about Russia’s position regarding the Ukrainian preside’s speech to the Ukrainian parliame about the “Victory Plan”: “There may be another plan that is truly peaceful; And this is the recognition of the futility of the policy pursued by the Kiev regime.”

This official stated that the “peace plan” considered by Zelenskiy may actually be the plan of the Americans, by which the Ukrainians will coinue to fight against Russia uil the last person, adding that in order to achieve peace, Kiev must wake up and find out the reasons that led to the conflict. has been, to understand.

The Kremlin spokesman also said that Moscow hopes that the authorities of European couries will finally understand the futility of spending money on aid to Ukraine.

* The five clarified clauses of Zelensky’s victory plan

In the first paragraph of his victory plan, the Preside of Ukraine has called for Ukraine’s membership in NATO and the European Union. In the second paragraph of his plan, he has called for the deepening of Ukraine’s defense capabilities, including the coury’s air defenses and an attack deep inside Russia using Western weapons.

As meioned, Ukraine’s allies have always opposed Kiev’s use of Western weapons to attack deep io Russia. On the other hand, Zelenskiy’s victory plan is proposed while, according to CNN, Russian forces are advancing “extensively” in eastern Ukraine, and it is expected that with the arrival of the cold season, the battlefield conditions will change more in favor of Russia than in the past.

However, in the third paragraph of his plan, Zelensky called for “joi defense operations with Ukraine’s allies in Europe to target Russian drones and missiles”, but in the past, Jens Stoltenberg, the then Secretary General of NATO, opposed this plan. And he said: “NATO will never eer this war.”

Zelensky also called for “coinuation of Ukrainian operations in Kursk, Russia” in the fourth paragraph of his plan. In early August, Ukrainian forces invaded the Kursk region, located in western Russia. According to analysts, “Zelensky’s gamble” in attacking Kursk was to gain “leverage” against Russia in any possible negotiations.

But, earlier, British and American sources reported that half of the Ukrainian-held areas in Kursk have been liberated, and this has put “the Ukrainian army on the brink of defeat.”

During his speech, Zelensky also expressed his desire to impleme a “massive non-nuclear deterrence package on the territory of Ukraine” and claimed that increasing “pressures” against Russia could “force” Moscow to accept a diplomatic solution.

He did not announce details of his non-nuclear deterrence plan, and this issue has faced criticism from the American media.

* Making baseless claims against Iran, China and North Korea

On the other hand, the preside of Ukraine, without preseing any clear documes, made hostile statemes, while criticizing Iran, China and North Korea for their “support” of Russia, and claimed: “The coalition of criminals next to Putin (Preside of Russia) includes North Korea.” “

He added: “Everyone sees the help of Iran and China to Russia.”

Zelensky’s hostile statemes are while he is accused by the couries of the South and Moscow of propagating the views of “Nazism” and “participating in the proxy war of the West against Russia” and the authorities of Iran and China have always rejected the claims of Kiev and all of them wa to reach a diplomatic solution. to end the conflict in Ukraine.

On the other hand, Zelensky’s victory plan has also faced domestic criticism. Ukrainian journalists have written in the description of his plan: “There is no hope for the implemeation of this failed plan. But, saddest of all, there is no provision for peace, freedom for Ukraine, or a practical solution to ending the war in this plan.”

end of message