What are the most importa differences between Netanyahu and Tel Aviv’s military-security authorities? – Mehr News agency RCO News Agency
Mehr News Agency, Iernational Group: The discovery of the bodies of 6 Zionist prisoners caused the start of a new round of public demonstrations in the occupied territories for Netanyahu’s withdrawal from the condition that Israeli forces remain in the border strip with Egypt; In particular, it has become the ceer of Philadelphia. Based on the published information from the Doha-Cairo negotiations, it seems that the parties to the conflict have reached a general agreeme on almost all clauses and are negotiating only on how to impleme them. However, Netanyahu’s insistence on not withdrawing the occupying army forces from the meioned border line has caused the Hamas moveme to reject any agreeme with the occupying forces and to demand pressure from the iernational community on the Zionist regime to unconditionally accept Security Council Resolution 2735.
This disputed issue has not only raised the voice of Hamas or mediator actors, but the heads of security services and Israeli military commanders also believe that Tel Aviv does not have much time to bargain and in order to return the prisoners alive, they must accept the ceasefire agreeme quickly.
The most importa difference between Netanyahu and the members of the security cabinet of the occupying regime is the remaining of the Israeli army forces in the Netsarim corridor and the Philadelphia axis. The Prime Minister of Israel believes that the meioned areas are the vital highways of Hamas, and if they are not under the corol of the army, all the achievemes of Israel in rece mohs will be lost.
In the rece meeting of the cabinet, he asked its members to vote for a plan that considers the presence of Israeli army forces in the Philadelphia axis in its various scenarios. During this voting, Galla voted “negative” and Ben Goyer voted “absteion”. While Netanyahu insists on the condition that David Barne and Ronan Bar, the heads of the Mossad and Shin Bet, believe that the coinuation of this situation can seriously endanger the lives of the Zionist prisoners.
Another poi of difference between the Zionist leaders can be seen as the difference between Netanyahu and Galla over the number of released prisoners. The Prime Minister of Israel believes that if a large number of Palestinian prisoners, especially its political leaders and military commanders, are released, Israel’s iernal security will face a serious threat. On the other hand, Israel’s Minister of War believes that Tel Aviv has no choice but to accept this issue in order to reach an agreeme. The scope of this difference can be seen in the idea of deporting Palestinian prisoners. The Zionist rightists wa to deport the released prisoners to European couries, Turkey and Qatar, but Galla and security officials believe that this can lead to iernational problems for Israel in the near future.
The difference in the understanding of priorities can be seen as the main reason for the difference between Netanyahu, Galla, Barne and Bar. As the prime minister, Netanyahu pays atteion to issues such as maiaining the achievemes in the field and not collapsing the cabinet, and the military commanders and security officers, under the influence of iernational pressure, demand more flexibility in negotiations to reach an agreeme that provides the ierests of all actors.
Netanyahu has clearly stated among his ministers that if he has to choose between prisoners and maiaining the Philadelphia corridor, he will definitely choose the latter. Perhaps for this reason, the head of Mossad told her in a meeting with the mother of one of the prisoners that there is little chance that an agreeme on the exchange of prisoners will be reached in the Netanyahu governme. After the bodies of 6 Zionist prisoners were found, more than 350,000 people came to the streets of occupied Palestine on the evening of September 1st to voice their opposition to Netanyahu and demand a quick agreeme with Hamas.
The experience of the last 10 mohs has shown that when Netanyahu is under severe pressure from America or public opinion, he commits “suicide” and tries to disrupt the focus of his oppones and critics by creating a crisis outside occupied Palestine. The illegal attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus and the assassination of Martyr Haniyeh happened exactly when Netanyahu was under the most iense pressure to accept a ceasefire and stop fighting in Gaza.
On this basis, it is necessary for the members of the resistance network to understand Netanyahu’s political behavior in “be fully prepared” and not allow the Zionists to have a new adveure. In other words, the leader of the Likud party may take a big step towards the escalation of regional tension and the marginalization of prisoner exchange negotiations by issuing warras for the assassination of promine resistance leaders or attacks on Hamas ceers in Lebanon or other areas.
benefit of speech
The non-return of the remaining 103 captives in the Gaza Strip can be the final seal on the political life of all Israeli political, security and military officials. Right now, some families of prisoners who lost their loved ones may blame the regime leaders for the death of these people and take steps to physically remove Netanyahu. The general strike from universities to Ben-Gurin Airport shows the depth of Israeli society’s anger against Netanyahu and their efforts to convince the “dictator” to unconditionally accept a three-phase ceasefire. Analysts believe that with public opinion turning against the prime minister and the Israeli negotiating team, it is possible that the Biden administration will use new tools to persuade or pressure Tel Aviv.
The most importa obstacle in this process can be considered Netanyahu’s fear of the “collapse of the cabinet” and the departure of the leader of the “National Power” party, Ben Guer, from the governme. Although Netanyahu has a good chance in the possible elections in the rece poll of “Ma’ariv” newspaper, there are still many “buts” and “ifs” for him and his allies to win again. In such a situation, it seems that Netanyahu is looking for some kind of guaraee from the US and public opinion that if he accepts the ceasefire and the possible fall of the cabinet, he will not only eer the process of the fact-finding committee and be arrested due to a corruption case, but also the chance of winning the election. And he still holds the post of prime minister.
