English media: America threatens the world order, not China

According to Isna, the British analytical base “Middle East Eye” reported in an article with a brief description of the actions of China and the United States in the world and West Asia, that it is Washington that threatens the world order based on law, not Beijing.

According to this media, it is likely that the most importa geopolitical battle of the 21st ceury will be between the United States and China, and the United States considers itself committed to protecting the world order based on rules; The order that was created by Washington and has been carried forward since the American victory in World War II. This iernational order must be consiste with the iernational laws that have been developed since the establishme of the United Nations 80 years ago; But it is not so.

According to the British media, if we are optimistic, we can say that this world order is the ierpretation of the United States and the West on hand-picked aspects of iernational law; But if we are pessimistic, it should be said that the West has fundameally changed iernational law in favor of its own ierests.

The main goal in both cases is to serve the geopolitical ierests of the West and justify its hegemony. The western powers, who are drunk with pride, think that these laws serve their ierests, which means that the ierests of all human beings are included in the laws, but this is not the case.

In its main narrative, the West preses China as the main threat to this rule-based order and accuses this Asian nation of trying to challenge it; But these statemes of the West indicate a catastrophic cognitive anomaly that is evide in the decisions of Western leaders.

Diplomatic failures

According to Middle East Eye, Western couries accuse China of trying to destroy the iernational order, while this coury – unlike the United States – has not stationed its military outside its territory for almost half a ceury.

Moreover, China has never ierfered in the affairs of any coury and organized coups against foreign governmes, but America has. Also, unlike the United States, China has never imposed unilateral sanctions against any coury, except in cases where the United Nations Security Council has sanctioned a coury. Also, unlike the United States, China has only one military base abroad, and its navy is mainly prese in the South China Sea, an area where China’s supply chain is concerated.

China’s main territorial claim is over Taiwan, an island in the Pacific Ocean off China’s coast that the United States has explicitly recognized as part of mainland China since 1972 in three joi memorandums with Beijing. America also removed any ambiguity about its position on this issue by facilitating the process of expelling Taiwan from the United Nations and giving its seat to China. But today, Washington supports Taiwan’s autonomy and is committed to defending it against China.

“If China’s highly restrained and responsible behavior is preseed as a threat to the rules-based order, then how should the behavior of the United States and its closest allies, especially Israel, be assessed?” Middle East Eye reports.

The English media has iroduced the behavior of the United States and China in West Asia as another measure to measure the threat level of these two couries against the iernational order. Since the end of World War II, the United States considers itself the main supporter of peace and stability in this region; But in the last three decades, American plans in West Asia have systematically failed.

China and West Asia

Middle East Eye has considered the collapse of the agreeme between the Zionist regime and Palestine in 2000, the Afghanistan war in 2001 and the re-invasion of Iraq in 2003 as examples of America’s huge failures in the region, wars that have turned io catastrophic failures in both Iraq and Afghanistan. became.

According to this report, the failure of the US policy towards Syria, the reopening of foreign embassies in Damascus, as well as the “disgraceful withdrawal of the Trump administration” from the JCPOA show the failure of US policies in this region.

America only considered the ierests of the Zionist regime in the Ibrahim agreemes, and in the curre war in Gaza, it blindly supports the crimes of the Zionists, which has caused the protest of iernational institutions, including the Iernational Court of Justice of the Iernational Criminal Court.

On the other hand, China does not have any military bases in the region and has not stationed a single soldier there. In the past decades, Beijing has been successful in developing economic and trade relations and has signed strategic economic agreemes with Egypt, Iran and all members of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council.

Moreover, in rece years, China’s diplomatic efforts have resulted in 2 major breakthroughs. According to this report, while the United States tried to isolate the Iranian governme in the region, China helped to normalize relations between Tehran and Riyadh, which is considered an importa eve in the region.

At the beginning of this year, Beijing gathered the represeatives of differe Palestinian factions, especially Fatah and Hamas, in Beijing and they signed an agreeme, which gave more unity to the Palestinian curres in the region.

The Zionist regime has always tried to derail the negotiations by highlighting and exaggerating the alleged differences between the various Palestinian factions, but this action by Beijing showed that the various Palestinian factions are pursuing a common goal.

According to the British media, the United States has provided significa support to the Zionist regime’s genocide by sending many weapons and has also supported the Zionist regime in the United Nations Security Council. But the first serious step necessary to achieve lasting peace has been taken by China.

Given the lessons of history and the long list of failures of the United States in establishing an agreeme between Palestine and the Zionist regime, China can rightly claim that it can be a more suitable mediator for the ongoing negotiations on the Palestinian issue, a mediator that will behave more honestly.

“China’s success in this matter could significaly strengthen the rule-based order…an order that respects iernational law and iernational humanitarian law,” the British media report said. “The curre rules-based order claimed by the United States and its allies is just a word game that hides Western hypocrisy and double standards.”

China does not challenge the rules-based order that the West claims, but has joined the rest of the world in trying to respect iernational laws, consistely impleme them for all couries, and discard misleading Western terminology.

end of message