Does NATO change the rules to overthrow Russian fighters? – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

According to RCO News Agency, the telegraph wrote in a report that NATO members are discussing new laws that make it easier for them to overthrow Russian fighters.

According to the media, these talks focus on formulating a single set of guidelines to engage with enemy fighters. The high -ranking defense officials of the US -led military coalition want Russian fighters to carry missiles attacking land targets over NATO’s airspace.

According to a source informed of these conversations, weapons and flight paths of each fighter are considered key determinants of threat evaluation.

The NATO’s defense ministers are expected to discuss these plans at today’s meeting. NATO leaders, including US President Donald Trump, have supported Russian fighters who violate NATO airspace, but some member states are worried that taking a more strict position will lead to clashes with the nuclear rival.

Alexus Greecovic, a senior commander of the Allied European Allies in NATO, has privately called for the creation of a “unified and integrated air and missile defense system” to make it easier to respond to any future stimulation of Moscow. This will help him eliminate the so -called “national constraints” that may prevent him from being decisive.

Many NATO member states comply with different rules in the issue of conflict, despite the presence of the coalition under the umbrella. Some of them require that their pilots first approval and then act, and others can act on radar data. These differences have fueled the question of what is necessary for a Russian fighter to be overthrown over the united territory.

NATO held two emergency meetings based on Article 4 of NATO, following the provocative Russian measures in Estonia and Poland.

When three Russian MiG fighters entered Estonia’s airspace, modern Italian F-5 fighters flew to intercept them. The Russian fighters received the exit order and continued to escort the F -F -fighters to the international border. Internal sources have described the move as a “standard response”.