ار Trump’s strategic ambiguity for Gaza; Dream for Submission – Mehr News Agency | Iranian and world news

Al -Jazeera News reported in a report reviewing US President Donald Trump’s plan for a ceasefire in Gaza and wrote that details and schedules in the four -material project unveiled at the White House are still vague.. The plan has many ambiguities that can be critical to the future of Palestine and the region.

Al -Jazeera goes on to address three vital points in the project, which is a lot of ambiguity about it, these are:

1. How will Gaza run?

The plan predicts the “temporary transitional sovereignty for a non -political technocratic committee” that will monitor the affairs of the Gaza Strip, but how the committee is formed or who will choose its members is unclear..

In addition, the plan states that former British Prime Minister Trump and Tony Blair will lead the Peace Council, which oversees the ruling committee; But the roadmap does not clarify the nature of the relationship between this committee and the Palestinian committee, or to what level of everyday decisions will be made..

2. Will the Palestinian Authority Organization contribute to the formation of the Gaza government?

Trump’s plan states that transitional authorities will obtain Gaza control until “Palestinian Authority Complete its reform program” and “be able to restore Gaza control safely and effectively”. However, it is still unclear who will decide whether the Palestinian Authority is ready to control Gaza. Or what criteria should be adhered to by the Palestinian Authority for Gaza Strip?

There is no time table in this plan; We only see a vague statement. While Netanyahu has agreed to the proposal, rejecting the return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza, saying that Gaza will not be run by Hamas or Palestinian Authority.

1. How will the international force be formed?

The plan states that security in Gaza will be guaranteed by a “temporary international stability force”, but where will these forces come from and what is their mission? It is unclear which countries would like to send the force to Gaza, or which of them will be acceptable according to this plan?

The proposal also does not clarify the responsibilities and rules of the conflict. And it is unclear whether this force will act as an army, police force or supervisory force. And will he have Hamas’s mission? And will it be able to fight the Zionist forces to protect the Palestinians?

1. When will the Zionist regime withdraw from Gaza?

The proposal states that the Zionist regime will withdraw from Gaza based on the criteria, milestones and time -related frameworks related to disarmament.. This paragraph does not specify the timing of Zionists or clear criteria for how and when it happens.

In addition, the plan states that the Zionist regime will maintain a “security environment” in Gaza, and this will continue until the Gaza Strip is completely secure from any new terrorist threat. But there is no information about who will eventually decide when these conditions are met.

1. Is the formation of a Palestinian state?

Trump said at a press conference on Monday that many allies have been stupidly recognized by the Palestinian state, but in my opinion, they are doing it because they are tired of current events. The proposal refers to the possibility of forming a Palestinian state behind a thick wall of ambiguity, conditions and restrictions.

“As Gaza’s reconstruction is going on, and when the Palestinian Authority’s reform program is properly implemented, it may eventually provide conditions for a valid path to determining the fate of the Palestinian and forming a country, which we recognize as the wish of the Palestinian people,” the plan says.

Therefore, the development of Gaza and the Palestinian Authority’s reforms have been determined as a prerequisite, and even in that case, Trump has used the phrase “possible” to talk about the start of negotiations to form a Palestinian state, which means that this is not guaranteed at all..

The plan does not even recognize the Palestinian rights to form an independent state, but rather that the formation of an independent state is a goal that the Palestinians seek. Therefore, this clause, like other provisions of the statement, is accompanied by ambiguity and lack of clarity.