Attempt to disarm the resistance on the two fronts; What is the US and Israeli strategy? – Mehr News Agency Iranian and world news

According to RCO News Agency, al -Miyaddin news database examined the Zionist regime’s strategy on weapons of resistance groups in the region and wrote that this is a unit battle on three different fronts. Yemen, of course, is not far from the fire of these battles, but geography and political and social contexts put it in a different position.

Palestinian Resistance Weapon

The main focus of the US strategy for Gaza and the West Bank is the destruction of Hamas and removed it from the geographical and political scene of Palestine, and the disarmament of the West Bank and Gaza.

The weapon of resistance in Palestine has inflicted the most severe political, security and military blows to the Zionist regime, though elements that have previously had failed experiences in the fight against the Zionist regime have accepted the idea of ​​disarmament of the Zionist regime. They do not want to remain in the minds of the next generation of Palestinians with a naked foot of the Mercava tank. They do not want the flame of resistance to the Palestinian breasts because they consider the compromise as “the only strategic option for the Arabs”

Hezbollah weapon

Hezbollah in Lebanon has raised its voices in recent weeks and described the battle on the weapon as “Karbala’i”. Hezbollah points out that the ambush enemy in the south does not fulfill any obligation and continues to rape, expands its occupation, holds captives, and threatens Lebanon and resistance to a new round of war.

In the current unfavorable situation, a group of Lebanese are in a hurry to disarm Hezbollah to bring Lebanon back to the years of civil war and the abuse of the Zionist regime to hit the region’s resistance. The Lebanese government has passed two stages in interacting with the weapon issue. The first step is to align with “immediate and unconditional disarmament” plans, and the second is to adopt a “step -by -step” policy towards developments.

Al -Miyadin adds that, given the developments, there are three options for Hezbollah. Hezbollah will face a “obvious suicide” if it wants to deliver its weapons before achieving its goals, and if it does not deliver its weapon, it will have the danger of a new round of war with the Zionist regime. So Hezbollah tries to follow the “third option”. This option includes pressure to force the government and its allies to encourage Washington and Tel Aviv to interact with the demands of the Lebanese government on the one hand and the pressure on national dialogue to achieve “national strategy for security and defense”.

In this situation, the Lebanese government is confronted with three complex options. First: The return of the government’s decisions and its deadline for the “monopoly weapon” is based on Hezbollah’s will, which challenges the Lebanese government with its Arab and international allies. The second way is to implement this decision by force that it seems unlikely in the current context of Lebanon and may endanger Lebanon’s unity and increase the likelihood of a civil war. The third solution is to accompany Hezbollah to call and agree to a national strategy for security and defense, while at the same time exert pressure on the Zionist regime through Washington, Brussels and Paris to fulfill its obligations.

The most important thing about Lebanese statesmen, of course, is that they do not have independent decision -making and cannot make the final decision without foreign interventions.

Iraq’s weapons

The political and security confrontation between the US and Israel with the branches is difficult and complex. Washington resorted to the use of two tactics in his war against the branches: First; Weapons of sanctions and threatening to return Iraq to the 1980s and the severe siege of Iraq. Second, Iraq’s threat to the Zionist regime’s weapon. Some sources say Washington has warned that the Zionists will probably reproduce their war scenario against Lebanese resistance in Iraq.

In contrast, defending the weapon of resistance and its groups in Iraq is also a difficult task. In this regard, efforts have been made to pressure the Shiite authority in Najaf Ashraf to devote the fatwa of the jihad, which was the basis of the formation of the branches. However, authority has always been and will be a resistance option.