American media narrative of US bizarre offer to Iran

US officials say Donald Trump’s position on Iran’s nuclear program is vague, which has led to serious internal debate in the country.

Iran and the United States, which have held three indirect negotiations with Oman’s mediation on Iran’s nuclear program so far. The parties are scheduled to begin the fourth round of these talks, which are now in expert discussions, in Muscat on Sunday.

US President Donald Trump recently said in an interview with NBC C. that his goal of talks with Iran was to “completely dismantle Iran’s nuclear program”.

While US officials have made contradictory statements about how to limit Iran’s nuclear program during the talks.

Iran has always emphasized that nuclear weapons have no place in the country’s military or political doctrine, and if the US demand is the peaceful verification of Iran’s nuclear program, the agreement between Tehran and Washington can be achieved.

White House does not have a fixed position

The Wall Street Journal wrote in a report: Trump says negotiations with Iran are going well. US negotiator Steve Witekaf in Tehran-Washington negotiations three rounds of indirect negotiations with Iranian counterparts about restricting Tehran’s nuclear development, and will hold the fourth session of the negotiations in Oman on Sunday.

According to the report, “Witcaf has suggested that if Iran agrees to dissolve its nuclear program and buy enriched uranium to provide peaceful nuclear energy from the United States, it will lift the sanctions and refuse the military option against Iran. However, Iran has so far maintained its centrifuges in Egypt and has no intention of dissolving its nuclear program. On the other hand, the United States has not yet had a fixed stance on how to dissolve Iran’s nuclear program. “

Iran has repeatedly stated that enrichment is the country’s red line in nuclear talks.

Iranian Foreign Minister Sayed Abbas Arakchi recently responded to a question about the contradictory positions raised by the Americans on the issues they are looking for in the Tehran-Washington talks, saying: “Our positions are a principled position, it has its principles and therefore unchanged.” We move on the basis of the path and principles that are designed but we receive controversial messages from the other side, different people are talking, and sometimes one person says something that violates tomorrow or the same day!

“This is one of the problems, some believe that this is due to the start of the new government in the United States, and that they have not yet been fully established or have not yet designed their positions properly, some are taking into account negotiation,” Arakchi said.

Trump’s decision

Trump told reporters last Wednesday that “we have not yet made a decision on this, despite a statement in an interview with NBC about the complete dissolution of Iran’s nuclear program.” Trump administration officials have been raised over Republican criticism of the issue.

Trump, who has threatened to use a military option against it if Iran has threatened to impose serious restrictions on its nuclear program, has yet to bring other US allies in this regard, the newspaper wrote.

In a conversation, French Foreign Minister Jean -Noel Barrow said in an interview that Paris and other European capitals needed more strict measures than it was set to address the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, but rejected the use of a military option.

“We believe that there is no path other than a diplomatic solution to solve this Iranian problem,” he said.

Iran’s position

US officials, especially after the third round of negotiations, claimed that Iran, as the only nuclear country without a nuclear weapon, had no right to enrich the Nuclear Weapons Agreement, and that if it wants to use nuclear energy, it could import the fuel needed by its reactors from a third party.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baqaei said at a weekly News conference last Monday that some US officials have said that Iran has no right to have a fuel cycle. In practice, we exercise our right. The issue of the official stance of the Islamic Republic of Iran is based on Article 2 of the Treaty of non -spread. It is the right of the member states, where there is also the issue of fuel and enrichment.

He emphasized: Iran’s nuclear program is fully supervised by International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. They are observing on a daily basis, no deviation from the peaceful nature. Our determination to keep our nuclear program peacefully has already been proven, and in the future there is no plan to avoid this principled position. So I think the position of the Islamic Republic of Iran can really be brighter than that.

The end of the message