Gabdard: Trump believes in a diplomatic solution to Iran

According to RCO News Agency, US National Intelligence Director Tolsi Gabard in an interview with US correspondent Megan Kelly about the leak of confidential information from US and Zionist regime in a New York Times report and US President Donald Trump’s opposition to the Iranian regime. But it reflects the amount of importance and accuracy that the president spends on his decisions on serious issues such as war and peace.

Responding to Washington’s threats to Zionist policies to enter into a conflict with Iran, Gabard said: “We provide the president with the necessary information, and ultimately, it is the president who decides, and he has repeatedly stated that his goal is about Iran.”

Referring to Tehran-Washington’s indirect diplomatic diplomatic opportunity on Iran’s nuclear program, he said: “The president believes and confidence in the opportunity to achieve this result in a peaceful way of diplomacy and negotiations.” The president also knows that this is most of all in the interests of the American people.

Iranian officials have repeatedly rejected the US and the Zionist regime’s claim of military targets in Iran’s nuclear program and emphasized that the production and use of nuclear weapons has no place in Iran’s defense doctrine.

In addition, the International Atomic Energy Energy Agency, which Iran’s nuclear program is one of the most strict surveillance and verification programs, has not yet approved or proved the claim in its technical reports.

US President Donald Trump had threatened to take military action against it before the start of indirect Tehran-Washington talks.

However, Iranian officials emphasized the defense of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program and national interests in the face of any aggressive action, saying that military action is not only an “option”, but a “solution” of the problem.

Any agreement with Iran must include the most strict verification regulations.

The US National Intelligence Director in response to the anti -Iranian statements of the Zionist Zionist Lobby Mark Mark Duwitz that Iran is weaker as a result of the strategic developments in the region and that there is no more appropriate opportunity to dissolve Iran’s nuclear program. The president sometimes points to peace through power. He really expresses his goal that is also the position of Prime Minister Netanyahu, and I think many other in the world agree that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon.

“This is clear, but the problem is how to get it,” Gabard said. The president’s opinion has always been that if through diplomacy and negotiation, there is a way to achieve what is in our national interests, not as we close our eyes on everything, certainly any agreement with Iran must be accompanied by a range of strict regulations. Not something like the failed experience of the Brjam (nuclear deal) that President Obama did.

He said the agreement that Steve Witakaf, the US messenger is negotiating to achieve, will be in the interests of the American people.

The US National Intelligence Director welcomed various views on agreement with Iran, stressing that the illegal leakage of confidential information, including Trump’s internal talks with his advisors, should be stopped.

So far, Iran and the United States have held three indirect dialogue and a technical-expert meeting on Iran’s nuclear program and how US sanctions are lifted.

According to the Oman Foreign Ministry, the fourth round of talks to be held on Saturday will be postponed and the date of its hold will be announced.

US media sources have earlier quoted US officials as saying that the next meeting will probably be held in a European country.

Weakens the information seam of US democracy and security

Gabard said in response to the interview as to what the view of the content of the government’s high -level confidential meetings and how it affects his activities, for example, some of the New York Times reports were completely inaccurate and research on the source or resources that leaked this information. But its impact is to make our work much harder; You have to keep in mind in the room you are, and I have to keep watching everything I say. Because we are in a situation where this information is leaked, whether it is important from a person who wants to show a reporter, or worst of all those who ultimately intend to disrupt the president’s policies, our democracy and security will weaken, and it’s not just about having a problem with US president policies.

The US National Intelligence Director, noting that three people were reported to the Ministry of Justice, were investigating the other four people, which could be expected to be fired or abolished by security permits by identifying the outcome of their investigations and proved their charges.

In the final part of the interview, Gabard said that there is no formal communication between the Venezuelan government and the Venezuelan criminal gang of Venezuelan, saying that research is continuing. One of the common ways to publish confidential information is that they, for example, select a line from the front page, a line from the second page, and a third page of the third page that, when they come together, are in line with the narrative they try to present from the subject. The same thing happened.

The end of the message