Reuters: Iran -US negotiations are within the framework

According to RCO News Agency, British media on Friday surprised Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last month by announcing the start of indirect talks with Iran on its nuclear program last month.

Eight sources told Reuters about the talks that these talks are now focused on gaining key points, preventing Iran from accessing a nuclear bomb.

However, Iran has stated that the nature of its nuclear program is purely peaceful and the production and use of nuclear weapons has no place in its defense program.

So far, Iran and the United States have held three indirect dialogue and a technical-expert meeting on Iran’s nuclear program and how US sanctions are lifted.

According to the Oman Foreign Ministry, the fourth round of talks to be held on Saturday will be postponed and the date of its hold will be announced.

US media sources have earlier quoted US officials as saying that the next meeting will probably be held in a European country.

Brjam, the initial framework of the Oman negotiations

Reuters News agency reported in a report: The sudden change in US towards negotiating with Iran in April was a great for Netanyahu, who had traveled to Washington after Trump’s support for military attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities.

In the same vein, four sources informed Reuters that Netanyahu was less than four hours before a joint press conference at the White House, which was informed of the start of the US talks with Iran in the coming days.

However, in just three weeks, the United States and Iran have held three rounds of negotiations aimed at restricting Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions. The fourth round is expected to be held in Rome soon.

The British media went on to refer to details of the Tehran-Washington negotiations in recent weeks: Eight informed sources mentioned earlier said that the initial framework in question maintained the core of the “Comprehensive Comprehensive Action Plan” (Brigham), which Trump left in his first presidency.

According to these informed sources, the possible agreement will not be significantly different from the Year 2 nuclear deal, but it will be extended to 5 years, the monitoring mechanisms are intensified, and the “sunset” regulations expand, which stops parts of Iran’s nuclear program but do not completely destroy.

According to the sources, Iran, according to the provisions, restricts the size of the reserves and types of centrifuges and exports, exports, or seals its 2 % uranium reservoir under the unprecedented supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). All this is done in exchange for significant lifting of sanctions.

Reuters wrote: The US State Department, the Iranian State Department and the Netanyahu Office did not respond to requests for comment.

Former US negotiator Dennis Ross, both in Republican and Democratic governments, said: “Every new deal must go beyond the brokerage and make permanent structural changes in Iran’s nuclear capabilities; So that its infrastructure is reduced to the extent that the construction of the bomb is no longer a practical option.

He told Reuters: “Everything else keeps the threat of nuclear threshold alive.”

The contradictory message of the US position in the negotiations

There are several emerging red lines that negotiators must pass through to reach an agreement and prevent future military action.

The most important issue is Iran’s ability to enrich uranium. The United States and the Zionist regime say the process should be completely stopped to import Iran to supply the Uranium of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, the only current Iranian reactor on the Persian Gulf coast.

Netanyahu calls for a “complete halt to enrichment” and an agreement based on the “Libyan model” to destroy Iran’s nuclear infrastructure.

Although Iran has insisted that Iran’s right to enrich it is unaccountable, Reuters claimed three Iranian officials said the size of uranium reserves, sending it abroad and the number of centrifuges were discussed.

According to the proposals made in the April talks, Iran restricts enrichment to 1.5 % according to the Brjam. Iranian sources also said Tehran was willing to have a wider access to its nuclear facilities.

The suggestions made do not demand the complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure that are not considered by the Zionist regime and some US officials, but they impose permanent restrictions on uranium enrichment to prevent “quick access to nuclear weapons.”

US envoy to West Asia, Steve Witekaf, who chaired the US negotiating board in Oman’s talks, confirmed the stance last week. However, he later emphasized that Iran should “stop and remove” enrichment.

A solution is to accept long interruptions in Iran’s enrichment program through extension of sunset regulations, said Alex Watanka, a senior Middle East researcher in Washington.

An Iranian senior security official told Reuters that another case could be compromised, including maintaining a minimum enrichment of 4,000 centrifuges and the import of enriched uranium, probably from Russia.

The three Iranian officials said Tehran demands strong guarantees that Trump would not leave a nuclear deal again. The sources added that the decline in enriched uranium reserves below the agreed level in the brokerage is one of Iran’s red lines.

In December, the agency announced that Iran was able to “significantly” in its purity by 5 %.

Brajam only allowed Iran to accumulate uranium enriched by the IR-1 centrifuges, but now Iran is using more advanced models that were banned under agreement.

A regional source close to Tehran said the current debate over Iranian uranium reserves is whether “the diluted part of it was kept in the country and the other may be sent to Russia.” According to the source, Iran has even proposed to sell enriched uranium to the United States.

Iran has currently activated about 5,000 centrifuges. Under the brigade, Iran was allowed to use about 5,000 centrifuges.

“Basically, negotiations are being held to” Brjam 2 “with some added that allow Trump to show it, while Iran continues to maintain its enrichment right,” the report said.

Another issue is the production of Iranian ballistic missiles. The US and the Zionist regime say Iran should stop production of missiles. Iran is opposed to it and says that it reserves the right to defend itself. An Iranian official had earlier told Reuters that Tehran would not go beyond the requirements of the brigade.

A regional security official said Washington insists on the missile program to be included in the negotiations, but Iran “rejects any debate”.

“The problem is that without addressing the missile issue, Trump cannot claim that the new deal is beyond the brokerage,” he said.

Ross, the former negotiator, pointed to the existing contradiction and said: “Trump abandoned the Brigham because of weakness and is now facing the fact that Iran is on the verge of building a nuclear weapon.”

Saying that “accepting an agreement that is similar or weaker than the original is politically non -defensive,” he suggested that the agreement should reduce centrifuges from 6,000 to one thousand, remove all enriched uranium reserves and impose severe inspections with fines.

The end of the message