Mafia -style diplomacy – ISNA

According to RCO News Agency, the Guardian magazine wrote in a post on US President Donald Trump’s foreign policy, “a new and worrying order is being formed” that former US allies should not normalize or legitimize Trump’s concept of international trading.

Referring to Trump’s provocative remarks against Gaza and threatening the Palestinians from their ancestral lands, the Guardian writes: “Nothing about Donald Trump’s idea that Gaza should be controlled by the United States is in accordance with the laws and customs accepted by international relations. . But the current White House government is disgusted with traditional methods and intends to fundamentally change the world so that it is impossible to return to order before Trump. “

The English magazine believes that Trump’s ridiculous contradiction for Gaza’s “occupation” does not diminish its ominous nature. His desire for forced displacement of 1.5 million Palestinians to neighboring Arab countries is a clear confirmation of a crime – ethnic cleansing.

The Guardian believes: “The idea of ​​turning Gaza into” Mediterranean resort “after its occupation by the United States, while annoying, is ridiculously far from reality. Trump treats a war -torn area in the heart of one of the most sophisticated conflicts in the world, as a deserted property in Manhattan. He plays a corrupt language in the language of millions of people in the language of a mafia boss. “The inevitable result is the simplistic and cruel approach to complex international issues, the spread of fear, uncertainty and instability.”

According to this article, such an approach increases unnecessary instability at a time when a completely different approach is essential to preserving fragile ceasefire in Gaza. All the Middle East governments, except for Benjamin Netanyahu’s extremist nationalist coalition in the occupied territories, find Trump’s involvement as dangerous and destructive.

“This view is among the European European allies – the same countries that considered themselves independent of the American allies up to two weeks, but now they have realized that such a concept is in the mind of the US president,” the Guardian writes. She only recognizes three categories; Customers, competitors and enemies. It is possible to move between these categories only by flattery and privileges. But sustainable alignment based on common interests, legal obligations of democratic treaties and values ​​no longer have a place in the White House. “

It is said that this is a major reinforcement for Russia and China’s “geopolitical ambitions” and confirms the cruel approach of “the right to be stronger” in international relations.

“This policy gives the same kind of imperialist land that Vladimir Putin is pursuing in Ukraine,” the Guardian refers to the Ukrainian war. For Beijing, the period of unstable and unreliable America has lucrative economic and strategic opportunities. “China sees itself as a superpower that is most predictable.”

According to the Guardian, there is a common justification that explains his disobedience as an initial tactic in the negotiation. Trump’s abnormal ideas, such as the US capture of Gaza, are stained as the improvisation of a “trademark” merchant. He is introduced as a professor in the “Politics of Records” (the policy of going to the boundary of the war for the opponent), which, with shock and chaos, confuses competitors to eventually achieve more reasonable results.

The Guardian believes, but this analysis seems to be more simplistic, even if it is in line with the mental image of the US president. He may think that he is merely a “deal”, but others need to know that the more correct terms are “coercion” and “ransom”.

“In history, there are many examples of tyrannical rulers who have expanded the chaos inside and outside their land,” the English magazine concludes. But there is no record of such a situation for the world’s most powerful democracy, and no guidance is available to help its former allies in the face of these conditions. But one point now is clear; “Hoping that the US under Trump’s leadership can adhere to old rules is not a reliable strategy.”

The end of the message