When artificial intelligence does not swing Trump’s lies

US President Donald Trump, who after returning to the White House as a staunch supporter of artificial intelligence, keyed the Stargit project on his second business day; The largest infrastructure plan for American history to develop artificial intelligence. He holds a meeting with giants such as Sam Altman, Ilan Musk and Mark Zuckerberg, and in his budget bill has proposed a five -year ban on artificial intelligence in states, a move aimed to consolidate American domination in the AI ​​world competition.

What was the result?

In a word: Almost all Trump’s claims were rejected by artificial intelligence models.

In three of the three key questions, three models or more (in most of the five models) explicitly assessed Trump’s words inaccurate, exaggerated, or misleading. Even in “softer” responses, models have violated parts of the claims. Some examples:

Has America been victim of unfair trade?

AIs replied: It is more complicated than Trump’s claim. The United States is faced with imbalances in some areas, such as trade with China, but the “exploitation” claim is not right.

Is Trump’s investment in Ramsar conflict?

Claude and Grok replied: Yes, these investments create potential conflict at the same time as government policy making.

Has the Ministry of Government Productivity really discovered hundreds of billions of dollars in corruption?

The answer was: The announced figures are exaggerated and without legal documentary; Most of the savings have been related to the elimination of budgets such as foreign aid or social justice projects, not the discovery of corruption.

Is Harvard University the most anti -university in America?

Models emphasized that Harvard is involved in complex issues that many other universities face. This claim is exaggerated.

Are the US media all lies?

ChatGpt replied: The media may make a mistake, but claiming that the whole media is “liar” is itself misleading.

Was the election stolen?

All models responded: No. There is no credible evidence for organized fraud. Courts, independent institutions, and even Republican observers have rejected the claim.

Were illegal immigrants in Biden been 5 million and often criminals?

The models said: The statistics are much lower than that, and most immigrants have no criminal record. Trump’s claim is exaggerated and deliberately provocative.

This experiment not only shows AI’s ability to verify, but also reveals a deeper reality; Technology, despite all its challenges, can critique the claims of politicians with precision and independence, even if that politician is the flagship of AI in the White House.